2007
DOI: 10.2202/1542-6580.1368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review on Flow Regime Transition in Bubble Columns

Abstract: Due to varied flow behavior, the demarcation of hydrodynamic flow regimes is an important task in the design and scale-up of bubble column reactors. This article reviews most hydrodynamic studies performed for flow regime identification in bubble columns. It begins with a brief introduction to various flow regimes. The second section examines experimental methods for measurement of flow regime transition. A few experimental studies are presented in detail, followed by the effect of operating and design conditi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
4
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The interested reader may also refer to the discussion proposed by Lott et al [99] concerning this instability. Also, the temperature seems to have a stabilizing effect over the homogeneous flow regime [78,100,101] due to the formation of small bubbles [1,2,101,102]. The combined effect of pressure and temperature was studied by Lin et al [101] (p c = 0.1-15.2 MPa, T c = 298-350 K) showing a stabilization of the homogeneous flow regime; it can be stated that many industrial processes may be run in the pseudo-homogeneous flow regimes.…”
Section: Pressure and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interested reader may also refer to the discussion proposed by Lott et al [99] concerning this instability. Also, the temperature seems to have a stabilizing effect over the homogeneous flow regime [78,100,101] due to the formation of small bubbles [1,2,101,102]. The combined effect of pressure and temperature was studied by Lin et al [101] (p c = 0.1-15.2 MPa, T c = 298-350 K) showing a stabilization of the homogeneous flow regime; it can be stated that many industrial processes may be run in the pseudo-homogeneous flow regimes.…”
Section: Pressure and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods have been presented over the last few decades, as discussed by Shaikh and Al-Dahhan [102], Nedeltchev and Shaikh [26] and Nedeltchev [27]. The most common methods employed are statistical methods (by interpretation of the ε G -U G curve), the swarm velocity [7,11,34,46,[51][52][53]75,76,89,91,229,315,316] and the drift flux [7,11,34,38,46,51,53,75,76,229,[316][317][318] approaches.…”
Section: The Flow Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.5). In the homogenous regime of a bubble column, the coalescence and breakup can be neglected [49]. Moreover, two or three velocity classes can describe the main effects of the bubbly flow, as suggested in Ref.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other method used by Kim et al [16,17], Shaikh and AlDahhan [18], and Begovich and Waston [19] to find the holdup was adopted. The theoretical basis of this method is that under the steadystate conditions, the total axial pressure gradients of any cross section in the column represents the total weight of the bed consisting of the three phases per unit volume Equation (2).…”
Section: Measurement Of Phase Holdupmentioning
confidence: 99%