2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on failure mechanism of thermal barrier coatings and strategies to extend their lifetime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 459 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, considerable efforts are directed at attempts to implement them for improving the functional characteristics of austenitic stainless steels [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Key challenges for the success of these endeavors are incompatibility of microstructures and properties of the materials at the metal/ceramic interfaces [13,14,, as well as residual stresses in the coatings [13,21,[52][53][54][55], causing low adhesion and their delamination from the substrates. It should be noted that morphology (roughness) and other characteristics of the substrate surface layers also have a significant effect on the obtained results [21,56,57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, considerable efforts are directed at attempts to implement them for improving the functional characteristics of austenitic stainless steels [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Key challenges for the success of these endeavors are incompatibility of microstructures and properties of the materials at the metal/ceramic interfaces [13,14,, as well as residual stresses in the coatings [13,21,[52][53][54][55], causing low adhesion and their delamination from the substrates. It should be noted that morphology (roughness) and other characteristics of the substrate surface layers also have a significant effect on the obtained results [21,56,57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key requirements in TBCs that form the basis of performance assessment are listed here. The comparative analysis and discussions in the following sections will be based on these parameters to comprehend the improvements and shortcomings in N tbc and C tbc systems [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Tbc Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tetragonal zirconia in a metastable phase (t'-ZrO 2 ) is considered ideal due to its low intrinsic thermal conductivity (~2.5 W/mK) and high fracture toughness A different processing route, namely nanostructuring of standard TBC materials, has generated tremendous interests in industry and academia recently. Nanostructured thermal barrier coatings (Ntbc) have exhibited superior thermal insulation effect, strain compliance, low thermal conductivity and good thermomechanical properties over conventional TBCs (Ctbc) [17,[35][36][37][38][39][40]. Nanotechnology has been successfully applied to modify the microstructure with porosity control in 7%-8% YSZ TBC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excellent properties of 8YSZ are attributed to its columnar microstructure with perfect strain tolerance and adhesion, prevention of phase transformation of ZrO 2 by yttrium, and reduction in thermal conductivity by oxygen vacancies and yttrium. However, despite these impressive properties, YSZ coatings exhibit certain disadvantages, such as a limited operating temperature (1200 • C), hot corrosion, and phase transformation (~1200 • C) [12][13][14]. Hence, 8YSZ is less stable above 1200 • C, and its thermal conductivity should be lowered to withstand high temperatures [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%