2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3090165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review on Electronic Nose: Coherent Taxonomy, Classification, Motivations, Challenges, Recommendations and Datasets

Abstract: Context: Quality Control (QC) has been constantly an essential concern in many fields like food industry production, medical drugs, environmental protection, and so on. An odor or flavor, as a global fingerprint, can be implemented as a non-invasive mechanism for quality assurance. This computer-based approach can assure accurate detection and precise identification of the product quality or manufactured goods.Objective: This paper aims to achieve a systematic review about e-nose by introducing the achievement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 2019 ), Yu et al ( 2021 ) HS-SPME Low detection limit, relative high sensitivity, simplicity, speed, wider compound coverage, and higher throughput, simple operation and fast test speed, basically no solvent, little environmental pollution, less sample consumption Sulfur and sulfide compounds cannot be detected (De Giovanni and Marchetti. 2020 ) Zeng et al ( 2008 ) and Zeng et al ( 2009 ) E-nose Low cost, accurate, fast, reliable and portble Data collection are tedious and labor intensive, data collection from different sources, the e-nose performance is highly affected by temperature modulation (Al-Dayyeni et al 2021 ; Lei and Zhang. 2015 ) Chen et al ( 2021 ) and Jana et al ( 2015 ) GC-O-MS Identification of key aroma-active compounds accurately, capable of illustrate relationship between odorants and sensory properties Limited scope of application, need to train professionals to operate (Song and Liu.…”
Section: Evaluation Methods For Cooked Rice Flavormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2019 ), Yu et al ( 2021 ) HS-SPME Low detection limit, relative high sensitivity, simplicity, speed, wider compound coverage, and higher throughput, simple operation and fast test speed, basically no solvent, little environmental pollution, less sample consumption Sulfur and sulfide compounds cannot be detected (De Giovanni and Marchetti. 2020 ) Zeng et al ( 2008 ) and Zeng et al ( 2009 ) E-nose Low cost, accurate, fast, reliable and portble Data collection are tedious and labor intensive, data collection from different sources, the e-nose performance is highly affected by temperature modulation (Al-Dayyeni et al 2021 ; Lei and Zhang. 2015 ) Chen et al ( 2021 ) and Jana et al ( 2015 ) GC-O-MS Identification of key aroma-active compounds accurately, capable of illustrate relationship between odorants and sensory properties Limited scope of application, need to train professionals to operate (Song and Liu.…”
Section: Evaluation Methods For Cooked Rice Flavormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because each flour has unique aromatic properties, it is important to understand it in order to obtain the desired flavor compounds. Danielle Laure Taneyo Saa et al [ 52 ] applied nanoelectronic smelling to study the volatile aspects of different bakery products made using both mature and immature grains and transformed by fermented dough of the genus Lactobacillus. The results show that nanoelectronic smelling can distinguish between doughs composed of two types of flour, and the study verifies that, as a first step in the baking process, a rapid analysis can be performed using nanoelectronic smelling to verify the aromatic compounds of each flour and to control whether the flour is the correct type.…”
Section: Analysis Of Microbial-based Foods By Nanoelectronic Smellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic nose (E-nose) is a rapid detection instrument that has been rising in recent years [9,10]. The instrument is composed of a sensor array with several different sensors and some machine learning algorithms, which are capable of recognizing simple or complex odors [11,12]. Given their rapid recognition ability while still being compact and lightweight, this technique has been attracting extensive attention in the pesticide detection field [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%