2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11184908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review on Ecosystem Health Research: A Visualization Based on CiteSpace

Abstract: With ecological environments that play vital roles in sustaining human communities worsening, ecological health has drawn extensive attention from scholars and practitioners. It is obvious that research results relevant to ecological health are increasing. This study applies scientometric methods to evaluate the current situation of ecological heath research, and explore the developing trends of ecological health research based on the literature data obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection database. S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the four-stage division results we obtained, the keywords and software calculation results are reasonable. By reading the relevant review literature, we find that some studies divide the historical development process of research goals into three stages [102][103][104], and some divide them into five stages [105], but they are mainly determined based on the method and the literature. The stage division results of this article may deviate from expert experience, but it is also a result that can be referred to.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the four-stage division results we obtained, the keywords and software calculation results are reasonable. By reading the relevant review literature, we find that some studies divide the historical development process of research goals into three stages [102][103][104], and some divide them into five stages [105], but they are mainly determined based on the method and the literature. The stage division results of this article may deviate from expert experience, but it is also a result that can be referred to.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CiteSpace, developed by Professor Chen Chaomei of Drexel University in the United States, is known for its powerful document co-citation analysis. CiteSpace is used by scholars to explore research hotspots, frontiers, and trends and is now widely used in more than 60 fields, including computer science, information science, food, and medicine [62][63][64][65]. To accurately and comprehensively analyze the development status and research hotspots in the field of food security and to develop visualizations thereof, this paper analyzes the research status and hotspot trends in the field of food security using the software packages CiteSpace 5.5, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix.…”
Section: Research Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adding Chinese literature databases (CNKI), summaries on global research can be more accurate and also allow for comparisons among the three databases [55]. Yang et al (2019) used Citespace software scientometrics analysis to assess ecosystem health and highlighted the most relevant journals, articles, keywords, influential authors, and future research directions to readers based on the WOS database. The intent was to help researchers stay at the frontier in this field and to establish future research topics/directions [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al (2019) used Citespace software scientometrics analysis to assess ecosystem health and highlighted the most relevant journals, articles, keywords, influential authors, and future research directions to readers based on the WOS database. The intent was to help researchers stay at the frontier in this field and to establish future research topics/directions [49]. In addition, Retno (2020) used the VOSviewer software's simple analysis to indicate the publication numbers, journals, countries, document types, authors, and research areas related to GI from 2009-2019 based on the Scopus metadata [56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%