2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-019-1529-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on commercial-scale high-value products that can be produced alongside cellulosic ethanol

Abstract: The demand for fossil derivate fuels and chemicals has increased, augmenting concerns on climate change, global economic stability, and sustainability on fossil resources. Therefore, the production of fuels and chemicals from alternative and renewable resources has attracted considerable and growing attention. Ethanol is a promising biofuel that can reduce the consumption of gasoline in the transportation sector and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Lignocellulosic biomass is a promising feedstock to pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
255
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 353 publications
0
255
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With maximal yields of 0.63g/g, sugar costs of less than $0.32/kg ($0.145/lb) would still be needed for biobased routes to have feedstock costs comparable to newer ethylene based petrochemical processes. Sugar costs are a challenge in the bioeconomy in general, particularly for biobased commodities and especially for biofuels (Chen et al, 2013;NREL, 2013;Taylor et al, 2015;Rosales-Calderon and Arantes, 2019). These costs may well be achievable with second generation cellulosic based sugars as technologies for their production mature (Youngs and Somerville, 2012;Kühner, 2013;Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With maximal yields of 0.63g/g, sugar costs of less than $0.32/kg ($0.145/lb) would still be needed for biobased routes to have feedstock costs comparable to newer ethylene based petrochemical processes. Sugar costs are a challenge in the bioeconomy in general, particularly for biobased commodities and especially for biofuels (Chen et al, 2013;NREL, 2013;Taylor et al, 2015;Rosales-Calderon and Arantes, 2019). These costs may well be achievable with second generation cellulosic based sugars as technologies for their production mature (Youngs and Somerville, 2012;Kühner, 2013;Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One appealing purpose of bioenergy crops is the deconstruction of their biomass into aromatics and simple sugars for downstream conversion into bioproducts. This strategy has been put forward for the environmentally sustainable production of fuels and chemicals currently derived from petroleum refining [1]. However, several challenges still need to be overcome to render bio-based products cost-competitive vis-à-vis their petroleum-based counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues are now becoming critical for the human being, which urged the scientific community to find solutions to decrease our reliance on fossil fuels that should eventually change our life style. Biofuels and more generally biorefinery have emerged as promising solution whose purpose is to exploit microorganisms as cell factories to convert non-edible but renewable carbon sources such as lignocellulosic sugars into bioethanol as alternative energy (Duwe et al, 2019;Rosales-Calderon and Arantes, 2019) or into commodity chemicals that can replace those obtained from petrochemistry (Clark et al, 2012;Chen and Dou, 2016;Singhvi and Gokhale, 2019). In spite of the apparent sustainability of this solution, the use of chemoorganotrophic microbes such as yeast or E. coli present a caveat, as CO 2 is released during the process of carbon metabolism (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%