2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on CO2 mitigation in the Iron and Steel industry through Power to X processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the iron and steel industry, electrolysis can be performed as usual on water to produce H 2 or on the CO 2 emissions of the industry to obtain syngas (CO 2 electrolysis). Both the syngas and the H 2 produced can be used in a methanation process to obtain methane (power-to-methane) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of the iron and steel industry, electrolysis can be performed as usual on water to produce H 2 or on the CO 2 emissions of the industry to obtain syngas (CO 2 electrolysis). Both the syngas and the H 2 produced can be used in a methanation process to obtain methane (power-to-methane) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the second method, i.e., DRI, integration of power-to-H 2 has the potential to lead to the low energy consumption (3.5-3.7 MWh/t steel) and net-zero CO 2 emissions (if carbon-free electricity is used, corresponding to 97-100% emission reduction). Still, to make the power-to-H 2 -DRI route competitive, carbon allowances should reach approximately EUR 62 per t CO 2 and electricity price should be below EUR 40 per MWh e [11]. The subsequent process following the DRI, i.e., the EAF, can also benefit from power-to-methane integrations, as partial substitution of electrical energy by natural gas in EAF may be beneficial for CO 2 reduction, thanks to the increment in the efficiency of the process [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Department of Energy predicts that the cost of producing hydrogen power will continue to fall from $6 kg −1 in 2015 to $2 kg −1 by 2025, which is motivating. Several studies in the literature have further discussed the political challenges and the progress considering the urbanisation, economics, role, and involvement of industry as well as marketing strategies [4,[6][7][8][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Particularly, ongoing activities in the field of climate change, implementation of fuel cell technology, and urbanisation and public investments [28][29][30][31][32][33] are depicted.…”
Section: Political and Ecological Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the way green hydrogen is extracted, which has been affecting various sectors. Different processes can also lead to other chemical products classified such as Power to Iron, Power to Hydrogen, Power to Syngas, Power to Methane, and Power to Methanol [22]. As mentioned, the transport sector has been influenced directing towards the use of electrification that is powered by green hydrogen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the amount of renewable energy introduced and the cost of the entire system required by sector coupling in the energy system that also considers industry. Bailera et al presented the review of Power-to-X processes as applied to the iron/steel industry [19]. In addition, since sector coupling is a concept for the overall optimization of the energy system, many stakeholders need to cooperate to manage the energy system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%