2021
DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2021.1976674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on carbon pools and sequestration as influenced by long-term management practices in a rice–wheat cropping system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Green manure amendment increased the CPI and reduced the CMI due to the higher SOC and lower LOC. These findings highlight the key role of soil LOC in soil carbon management index when subjected to green manure amendment [26]. Lenka et al (2015) also confirmed that the CMI compares the change that occurs in SOC and LOC as a result of agricultural practices [8].…”
Section: Soil Carbon Management Indicessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Green manure amendment increased the CPI and reduced the CMI due to the higher SOC and lower LOC. These findings highlight the key role of soil LOC in soil carbon management index when subjected to green manure amendment [26]. Lenka et al (2015) also confirmed that the CMI compares the change that occurs in SOC and LOC as a result of agricultural practices [8].…”
Section: Soil Carbon Management Indicessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…On the other hand, the increased microbial activity also increases the stabilization and polymerization of the labile C fraction to the humus, resulting in higher C RC in the INM treatments. Similarly, in a review, Dheri and Nazir (2021) showed that the NPK + farmyard manure could increase the contents of both labile and recalcitrant C. However, in our study, the allocation of C to oxidizable SOC fractions was differently affected by applying gliricidia and farmyard manure in combination with NPK. One possible explanation for this is the differences in the composition/biochemistry of the applied organics.…”
Section: Carbon and Its Fractionscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…This result is in line with the study conducted [12] that C stock increases with increasing bulk density, and vice versa. Bulk density significantly affects C uptake by changing soil porosity [13]. The higher the bulk density value, the fewer pores in the soil, thereby reducing the potential for soil carbon loss through decomposition because microbes do not have sufficient oxygen supply and have little access to organic matter.…”
Section: Paddy Land Management Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk density alters soil porosity, which has a major impact on C uptake [13]. Because bacteria do not have adequate oxygen supplies and have limited access to organic matter, the potential for soil carbon loss through decomposition is reduced the higher the bulk density value and the fewer holes in the soil.…”
Section: Stockmentioning
confidence: 99%