2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on Anopheles subpictus Grassi—A biological vector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anopheles subpictus is a complex isomorphic sibling species and is recognized as a vector of malaria, a disease of great socio-economic importance, and also a vector of some helminth and arboviruses (Chandra et al 2010). A. subpictus is the most abundant anopheline in most parts of the Indian subcontinent (Rao 1984), and recognized as a primary or secondary vector of malaria, a disease of great socio-economic importance in different parts of the world (Panicker et al 1981;Kulkarni 1983;Chatterjee and Chandra 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anopheles subpictus is a complex isomorphic sibling species and is recognized as a vector of malaria, a disease of great socio-economic importance, and also a vector of some helminth and arboviruses (Chandra et al 2010). A. subpictus is the most abundant anopheline in most parts of the Indian subcontinent (Rao 1984), and recognized as a primary or secondary vector of malaria, a disease of great socio-economic importance in different parts of the world (Panicker et al 1981;Kulkarni 1983;Chatterjee and Chandra 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anopheles subpictus is a complex isomorphic sibling species and is recognized as a vector of malaria, a disease of great socioeconomic significance and also a vector of some helminthes and arboviruses (Chandra et al 2010). It is the most abundant anopheline in most parts of the Indian subcontinent and recognized as a primary or secondary vector of malaria in different parts of the world (Chatterjee and Chandra 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, aumentan la probabilidad de que se genere resistencia al insecticida. Estas razones llevan a que se exploren métodos alternativos que lleven a un mejor control de las poblaciones de mosquitos (Chandra et al, 2010), siendo el control biológico una opción que puede llegar a ser más efectiva si se realiza teniendo el suficiente conocimiento de base para evitar sus posibles perjuicios. El agente de control biológico más ampliamente usado es el "pez mosquito" del oeste Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard, 1853) y el "pez mosquito" del este G. holbrooki (Girard, 1859) (Kumar & hwanG, 2005) como exitosos invasores en numerosos lugares en donde han sido introducidos (Gamradt & Kats, 1996;howe et al, 1997;Goodsell & Kats, 1999;leyse et al, 2004;ayala et al, 2007;rowe et al, 2007).…”
unclassified