2021
DOI: 10.1002/asna.202113990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on algebraic extensions in general relativity

Abstract: A brief review on algebraic extensions of general relativity is presented. After a short summary of first attempts by Max Born and Albert Einstein, all possible algebraic extensions will be discussed, with the pseudo-complex (pc) extension left as the only viable one, because it does not contain ghost solutions. Also some metric extensions are presented, such as the non-symmetric gravitation theory and the Finsler metric. Some predictions of the pc extension are discussed, such as the structure of light emissi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we conservatively conclude that the present results are based on a preliminary approach, a quasi‐quantum approach. For a full quantization, probability distributions should be assigned to 1‐form dxμ$$ {dx}^{\mu } $$ and the fundamental tensor on four‐ and eight‐dimensional manifolds, noncommutation relations between 1‐form dxμ$$ {dx}^{\mu } $$ and the fundamental tensor should be invented, both quantities should be expressed by proper quantum operators, for the curved spacetime another fully quantizable algebraic or geometrical or phenomenological model should be utilized Hess (2021); Vasconcellos (2017), and for the local geodesic emerged with the additional curvature quantization should be introduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, we conservatively conclude that the present results are based on a preliminary approach, a quasi‐quantum approach. For a full quantization, probability distributions should be assigned to 1‐form dxμ$$ {dx}^{\mu } $$ and the fundamental tensor on four‐ and eight‐dimensional manifolds, noncommutation relations between 1‐form dxμ$$ {dx}^{\mu } $$ and the fundamental tensor should be invented, both quantities should be expressed by proper quantum operators, for the curved spacetime another fully quantizable algebraic or geometrical or phenomenological model should be utilized Hess (2021); Vasconcellos (2017), and for the local geodesic emerged with the additional curvature quantization should be introduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• for the curved spacetime another fully quantizable algebraic or geometrical or phenomenological model should be utilized Hess (2021); Vasconcellos (2017), and…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize, a proper full quantization of gtrue˜μν$$ {\tilde{g}}_{\mu \nu} $$ is likely conditioned to.expressing gtrue˜μν$$ {\tilde{g}}_{\mu \nu} $$ as a quantum operator or suggesting noncommutation relations for the coordinate basis vectors or imposing probability distribution functions or choosing another model for the spacetime quantization Hess (2021), Vasconcellos (2017) or introducing full quatization to the local geodesic x¨2$$ \mid {\ddot{x}}^2\mid $$ characterizing the additional curvature. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another prediction concerns the possible light emission from the surface of the dark star. The redshift z$$ z $$ at the surface depends on the azimuthal angle normalΘ$$ \Theta $$ and is lowest at normalΘ=0$$ \Theta =0 $$, that is, near the poles (see Figure 3) (Hess 2021). Although z$$ z $$ is very large at the orbital plane, it decreases toward the poles, also depending on the rotational Kerr parameter a$$ a $$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%