2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmate.2022.100054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing of directed energy deposition (DED) process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9] Even though 3D printing offers different advantages, such as rapid prototyping, fewer material compositions, faster production, product customization, and comprehensive material selection, each 3D printing technique has certain limitations. For example, the extrusion-based approach generates defects, such as delamination and void formation; 10 the vat polymerization technique has a limited build size from resins and light control; 11 the material jetting-based printing requires suitable inks, considering their viscoelastic properties and wettability with substrates; 12 the PBF-based printing generates components that have a low mechanical strength and limited surface finish; 13 the DED-based printing requires post-processing of components due to high surface roughness; 14 and LOM needs decubing with a labor-intensive process. 15 Some defects may significantly deteriorate the performance of 3D-printed components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Even though 3D printing offers different advantages, such as rapid prototyping, fewer material compositions, faster production, product customization, and comprehensive material selection, each 3D printing technique has certain limitations. For example, the extrusion-based approach generates defects, such as delamination and void formation; 10 the vat polymerization technique has a limited build size from resins and light control; 11 the material jetting-based printing requires suitable inks, considering their viscoelastic properties and wettability with substrates; 12 the PBF-based printing generates components that have a low mechanical strength and limited surface finish; 13 the DED-based printing requires post-processing of components due to high surface roughness; 14 and LOM needs decubing with a labor-intensive process. 15 Some defects may significantly deteriorate the performance of 3D-printed components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybridization opens infinite possibilities for enhancing part quality improvement and production rates [ 60 ];…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, oxide ceramics have shown great application potential in aerospace, energy chemical industry, and biomedical fields 1,2 . Nevertheless, the traditional solid‐phase sintered preparation process of raw material‐green body‐molding‐drying‐sintering‐finishing is time‐consuming and energy‐intensive 3,4 . More importantly, the addition of binders and sintering aids sacrifices the purity and density of ceramics, which severely affects their excellent performance in practical production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Nevertheless, the traditional solid-phase sintered preparation process of raw material-green body-molding-drying-sinteringfinishing is time-consuming and energy-intensive. 3,4 More importantly, the addition of binders and sintering aids sacrifices the purity and density of ceramics, which severely affects their excellent performance in practical production. The development and application of directional solidification techniques, including the Bridgman method, 5 micro-pulling method, 6 laser floating zone method, 7 and the edge-defined film-fed growth, 8 have simplified the preparation process to a certain extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%