2020
DOI: 10.1177/1060028020975646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of β-Lactam–Associated Neutropenia and Implications for Cross-reactivity

Abstract: Objective: To review the incidence, management, and current understanding of the pathophysiology of β-lactam–induced neutropenia and to critically evaluate the practicality and safety of direct substitution to an alternative β-lactam in the setting of this reaction. Data Sources: A literature analysis using the PubMed and Ovid search engines (July 1968 to October 2020) was performed using the search terms neutropenia, leukopenia, β-lactam, nonchemotherapy, agranulocytosis, and G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cornerstone of management of β‐lactam antibiotic‐induced neutropenia is the cessation of the causative agent. Direct substitution or future use of an alternative β‐lactam antibiotic is controversially discussed 7 . Because of the superiority of β‐lactam antibiotics compared to alternative therapeutic options for several infections including endocarditis, the present case suggests that the use of a β‐lactam with differing side chains should not be considered contraindicated after β‐lactam antibiotic‐induced neutropenia 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cornerstone of management of β‐lactam antibiotic‐induced neutropenia is the cessation of the causative agent. Direct substitution or future use of an alternative β‐lactam antibiotic is controversially discussed 7 . Because of the superiority of β‐lactam antibiotics compared to alternative therapeutic options for several infections including endocarditis, the present case suggests that the use of a β‐lactam with differing side chains should not be considered contraindicated after β‐lactam antibiotic‐induced neutropenia 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Drug‐induced neutropenia probably can occur with all β‐lactam antibiotics. Both direct toxic and immune‐mediated mechanisms have been implicated 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Moreover, hematologic effects of beta-lactams and serum sickness are often not seen until after 14 days of exposure on average and a repeat CBC/diff was not obtained for many patients (83/109 in TI group and 27/95 in the EI group). 8,25 This limits the interpretation of these findings, and further investigation into the effects of EI on bone marrow suppression and serum sickness with longer treatment durations is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging cross-reactivity studies support the substitution to an alternative β-lactam from a different group in cases of adverse events; however, this strategy in the setting of DIN is still under scrutiny, given the noted recurrence of neutropenia in 15%–30% of cases who are reintroduced to antibiotics. 22 These data mainly include reintroducing the same agent (ie, rechallenging) or substituting to an agent with a structural similarity, which does not contradict the use of alternative antibiotics with different side chains or structure, as they are believed to be the main contributors to cross reactivity amongst β-lactams. 23 One case report of ceftriaxone-induced neutropenia reported complete resolution after substituting with cefepime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%