2020
DOI: 10.5710/amgh.13.05.2020.3313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Vertebrate Beak Morphologies in the Triassic; A Framework to Characterize an Enigmatic Beak from the Ischigualasto Formation, San Juan, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent phylogenetic analyses based on molecular characters suggest that non-avian dinosaurs are deeply phylogenetically nested between the Chelonia, Crocodilia, and Aves (Schweitzer et al, 2009;Chiari et al, 2012;Crawford et al, 2015) so extant phylogenetic bracketing would support the absence of lips as the most likely condition at the root of the dinosaurian clade (Carr et al, 2017). Taking extinct taxa into account, the repeated evolution of a cornified beak among Archelosauria (e.g., in Chelonia, Pterosauria, Ornithischia, many non-avian Theropoda, and Aves) (Norell et al, 2001;Lautenschlager et al, 2013;Wynd et al, 2020) makes the presence of functionally important, non-redundant facial soft tissue an unlikely plesiomorphic state for this clade. All living reptilian species with lips belong to the Lepidosauria (Soares, 2002;Paul, 2018), thus suggesting that phylogenetic effects have to be taken into account while discussing the evolution of lips amongst Sauropsida.…”
Section: The Question Of Lips In Non-avian Theropodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent phylogenetic analyses based on molecular characters suggest that non-avian dinosaurs are deeply phylogenetically nested between the Chelonia, Crocodilia, and Aves (Schweitzer et al, 2009;Chiari et al, 2012;Crawford et al, 2015) so extant phylogenetic bracketing would support the absence of lips as the most likely condition at the root of the dinosaurian clade (Carr et al, 2017). Taking extinct taxa into account, the repeated evolution of a cornified beak among Archelosauria (e.g., in Chelonia, Pterosauria, Ornithischia, many non-avian Theropoda, and Aves) (Norell et al, 2001;Lautenschlager et al, 2013;Wynd et al, 2020) makes the presence of functionally important, non-redundant facial soft tissue an unlikely plesiomorphic state for this clade. All living reptilian species with lips belong to the Lepidosauria (Soares, 2002;Paul, 2018), thus suggesting that phylogenetic effects have to be taken into account while discussing the evolution of lips amongst Sauropsida.…”
Section: The Question Of Lips In Non-avian Theropodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbreviations: A, Aetosaurinae; D, Desmatosuchini; S, Stagonolepididae; St, Stagonolepidoidea; T, Typothoracinae. tary; see, e.g., Parrish, 1994;Holliday and Nesbitt, 2013;Wynd et al, 2020), it seems to have been absent in N. engaeus (Desojo, 2005;Desojo and Báez, 2007). Most non-aetosaurine aetosaurs lack a tall, thorn-like dorsal process on the articular (Figure 23I), which may have provided additional attachment sites for the M. depressor mandibulae (sensu Desojo and Vizcaíno, 2009), thus revealing further disparity of retroarticular process shape of aetosaurs (Figure 23I).…”
Section: Aetosaur Diet and Paleobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%