1995
DOI: 10.1080/02757259509532298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of vegetation indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
569
0
38

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,208 publications
(678 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
569
0
38
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 lists 19 vegetation, soil, and water indices that were derived from the Landsat 5 TM surface reflectance data and used in thematic classification. This is a small representative subset of the most widely used indices [12,56]. Another 18 morphometric terrain metrics were derived from the DEM to quantify the effects of topography and hydrological processes [28].…”
Section: Palsarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 lists 19 vegetation, soil, and water indices that were derived from the Landsat 5 TM surface reflectance data and used in thematic classification. This is a small representative subset of the most widely used indices [12,56]. Another 18 morphometric terrain metrics were derived from the DEM to quantify the effects of topography and hydrological processes [28].…”
Section: Palsarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the corrected MOD09GA result with MCD43A1 Collection 5 (Figure 7b), the spread of the Collection 6 result was narrower, with higher R 2 and lower RMSD and MAE, demonstrating the improvement of MCD43A1 Collection 6 over Collection 5. Moreover, it is important to note that BRDF correction improves the precision of even of ratio-based vegetation indices (VI) [46], due to its mitigation of the different anisotropies of different wavelengths. …”
Section: Variability Of the Mcd43a1 Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different vegetation indices have been developed and used for classification or biomass estimation (Anderson and Hanson 1992, Anderson et al 1993, Eastwood et al 1997. Bannari et al (1995) reviewed more than forty indices presented through the literature. However, not all vegetation indices are significantly correlated with biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%