2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of urban metabolism studies to identify key methodological choices for future harmonization and implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another strand of research uses the term urban metabolism rather metaphorically. These studies employ concepts and methods from political science, sociology, social geography or ethnography but usually do not aim at quantifying the biophysical processes at the core of SMR 46,47 ; for a recent review see 48 .…”
Section: Socio-metabolic Research Traditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strand of research uses the term urban metabolism rather metaphorically. These studies employ concepts and methods from political science, sociology, social geography or ethnography but usually do not aim at quantifying the biophysical processes at the core of SMR 46,47 ; for a recent review see 48 .…”
Section: Socio-metabolic Research Traditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of the Network Approach is identified to be the challenging implementation of analyses due to the big amount of data. This fact can be easily accepted as a reason of complexity yet still being the solution towards answering multi-dimensional analyses that can be very beneficial for urban level decision making [19].…”
Section: A Data Centric Approach For Urban Level Complex Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional UM methods 1 tend to incorporate accounting methods that rely on secondary data (Beloin-Saint-Pierre et al 2016), or statistical methods for downscaling aggregate data (Horta and Keirstead 2016;Currie and Musango 2016), rather than utilizing primary data based on bottom-up approaches. These studies therefore tend to ignore informal flows and processes of informal settlements, which are deemed data scarce areas (Currie and Musango 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional UM methods include economy‐wide material flow analyses; ecological footprint analyses; input‐output analyses; energy assessments; life cycle assessments; network analyses; and combinations of these methods (Beloin‐Saint‐Pierre et al. ; Musango et al. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%