2012
DOI: 10.21273/horttech.22.3.280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Turfgrass Fertilizer Management Practices: Implications for Urban Water Quality

Abstract: Urban watersheds include extensive turfgrass plantings that are associated with anthropocentric attitudes toward landscapes. Native and construction-disturbed urban soils often cannot supply adequate amounts of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) for the growth and beauty of landscape plants. Hence, fertilization of landscape plants is practiced. Mismanaged fertilization and irrigation practices represent a potential source of nutrients that may contribute to water quality impairment. This review focuses o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Land use type had a significant effect on N attenuation (p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA), and attenuation in turf sites was significantly greater than pasture or crop sites (Tukey's post hoc comparisons). Across all turf sites, mean nitrate attenuation was 90 ± 4% (Table 2), which is consistent with previous studies that show turf systems are highly efficient at attenuating N inputs, especially during the summer months (Barton and Colmer, 2006;Carey et al, 2012). The relatively low variability of turf attenuation, compared with crop and pasture, suggests that general categorization of urban turf is likely sufficient when scaling estimates up to the catchment scale.…”
Section: Urban Fluxes and Attenuationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Land use type had a significant effect on N attenuation (p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA), and attenuation in turf sites was significantly greater than pasture or crop sites (Tukey's post hoc comparisons). Across all turf sites, mean nitrate attenuation was 90 ± 4% (Table 2), which is consistent with previous studies that show turf systems are highly efficient at attenuating N inputs, especially during the summer months (Barton and Colmer, 2006;Carey et al, 2012). The relatively low variability of turf attenuation, compared with crop and pasture, suggests that general categorization of urban turf is likely sufficient when scaling estimates up to the catchment scale.…”
Section: Urban Fluxes and Attenuationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Visual observations at our turf site did reveal low runoff and streamflow during storms and base flow. Furthermore, Quiroga-Garza (2001) and Carey et al (2012) report low risk of N leaching from slow-release urea fertilizers similar to the type applied at Winterthur. We speculate that the type of fertilizer applied, the relatively modest/optimal fertilizer application rates (applied once a year), and the routine mowing all contributed to a turf system that was in a continuous, vigorous state of growth most of the year and thus was effective in retaining the nutrients.…”
Section: Suburban Landscape Management and Vegetation Effects On Watementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing homeowners with additional information regarding best management practices for lawn maintenance may prove a cost-effective method for policy makers in reducing nutrient and chemical runoff in suburban areas (Carey et al, 2012). For example, Maryland recently became one of eleven states to ban phosphorus in commercial fertilizer, citing its environmental impact to the Chesapeake Bay (SM News Net, 2014).…”
Section: Conclusion and Environmental Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban landscapes, and the soils that support them, can accumulate heavy metals and other nutrient chemicals through widespread atmospheric deposition or more site-specific point and corridor pollution events. The source of these heavy metals and nutrients may be local industry, vehicles and transport corridors, and excess fertilizer use in public and private green space (Carey et al, 2012;Milesi et al, 2005). If the capacity of urban soils to buffer or retain these pollutants is exceeded, the pollutants can percolate into the groundwater or waterways with negative impacts on riparian ecology, local human health, and food production (De Kimpe and Morel, 2000;Groffman et al, 2009;Law et al, 2004;Valtanen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%