Nanomaterials for the Detection and Removal of Wastewater Pollutants 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818489-9.00013-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of transport of nanoparticles in porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Scenario I, particles are assumed to be released from the upper half of the fluid envelope boundary with the start location ( r = b , θ ) for all θ in the interval [0, π/2]. The analytical velocity perpendicular to the fluid envelope boundary is U r = b = U ∞ cos θ (Boccardo et al., 2020; Masliyah & Bhattacharjee, 2006). Within an increment angle Δ θ , the number of particles entering into the fluid envelope boundary per unit time can be expressed as ( U ∞ cos θ ) C 0,2D ( b Δ θ ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Scenario I, particles are assumed to be released from the upper half of the fluid envelope boundary with the start location ( r = b , θ ) for all θ in the interval [0, π/2]. The analytical velocity perpendicular to the fluid envelope boundary is U r = b = U ∞ cos θ (Boccardo et al., 2020; Masliyah & Bhattacharjee, 2006). Within an increment angle Δ θ , the number of particles entering into the fluid envelope boundary per unit time can be expressed as ( U ∞ cos θ ) C 0,2D ( b Δ θ ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical velocity (see Text S4 in Supporting Information S1) of the Happel sphere-in-cell model along the fluid envelope boundary as shown in Figure 2c (purple line) is symmetric with respect to L shell and is much higher than the numerical solution. The discrepancy mainly results from the assumptions of the sphere-in-cell model, which treat the fluid as undisturbed by the collector out of the cell and apply the following boundary conditions (Boccardo et al, 2020):…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate prediction of nanoparticle (NP) mobility and fate in porous matrices is of high importance for many disciplines, e.g. , NP environmental risk assessment, 1,2 remediation applications, 3–5 natural NP in biogeochemical cycles, 6 NP as vectors for micropollutants 7 and microbial antibiotic resistance genes. 8 This is demonstrated by the plethora of macroscale column and modelling studies performed to date in order to understand and define the critical parameters that control NP transport and retention in porous media (PM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is partly because several retention mechanisms occur simultaneously. Furthermore, the heterogeneous pore geometry of the porous medium, which is a key NP transport parameter, cannot be easily included in these models, 19 to a large extent because we generally lack detailed information of the pore geometry ( i.e. size distribution, shape and connectivity of pores and throats) and how it affects NP retention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…size distribution, shape and connectivity of pores and throats) and how it affects NP retention. [19][20][21] Flow velocity is another key NP transport parameter, particularly for in situ remediation via NP injection, which is absent in continuum modelling filtration terms. This is because of difficulties in finding a functional relationship between NP retention and fluid flow velocity along with its many other dependencies, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%