2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the value of solar methodology with a case study of the U.S. VOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…horizon shading and latitude changes throughout Ontario), but also economic ones that would vary with for example the year, the penetration rate of solar, the value of offsetting GHG emissions, etc. Overall the value of solar (VOS) is a complex topic [86], which needs to be calculated for each specific case and is left for future work. In addition, the values shown here also do not include the second order effects (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…horizon shading and latitude changes throughout Ontario), but also economic ones that would vary with for example the year, the penetration rate of solar, the value of offsetting GHG emissions, etc. Overall the value of solar (VOS) is a complex topic [86], which needs to be calculated for each specific case and is left for future work. In addition, the values shown here also do not include the second order effects (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only do foam-based FPV appear to be the greenest crystalline silicon-based PV to date, when the lifetime of the modules is at least 26.6 years, as shown by the results of this study, but a recent study has also determined that using foam-based racking could reduce the cost of racking by $0.37–$0.61 per W as compared to pontoon-based racking or land-based PV racking. 48 Consequently, future work is needed to experimentally scale up foam-based FPV to investigate the real economic costs and viability of the system to find out the return-on-investment period of a foam-based FPV plant, as well as to compare the value of solar (VOS) 111 of the system to that of conventional PV systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For residential PV systems, more generation is usually fed into the grid than self-consumed [84], and this effect is heightened with heat pumps in northern climates; for example, in this case where 67% of generation occurs in the sunniest six months and 79% of heat demand occurs in the darkest six months (October through March). On the other hand, net metering can be critiqued as too stingy, as the VOS is greater than net metering rates in the U.S. [11] and more than likely higher in Canada as well (although future work is needed to verify this).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PV prices are expected to continue to decrease another 60% in the short term [7]. Already at scales from residential to industrial, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is lower than the net metered cost of grid electricity [8][9][10] and the value of solar (VOS) is even greater than net metering rates in the U.S. [11]. Simultaneously the PV technical community continues to drive improved performance [12] with black silicon [13,14] and bifacial PV modules [15,16] that will reduce solar electricity further [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%