1992
DOI: 10.1080/03078698.1992.9674036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the use and the effects of marks and devices on birds

Abstract: This paper reviews the use and the effects of marks and devices on birds. Although most papers reporting research on birds make use of marks or devices, very few studies test for harmful effects or data biases caused by these. Many research projects have used marks and devices without encountering any harmful effects of these on the birds being studied. However, where assessments have been made it is clear that all of the methods of marking can have adverse effects, while most devices attached to birds do alte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
139
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 228 publications
(175 reference statements)
0
139
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous studies (Caccamise and Hedin 1985;Calvo and Furness 1992;Wilson and Culik 1992), the mass of the fixed device should not exceed 5% of the bird body mass, while Kenward (1987) suggests that even devices constituting 3% might have a negative impact on birds' flight agility. According to Paredes et al (2005) and Harding et al (2009a), data loggers weighing approximately 3.0-3.3% of the bird body mass negatively affected the diving depth and duration, provisioning rates and frequency of foraging trips.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies (Caccamise and Hedin 1985;Calvo and Furness 1992;Wilson and Culik 1992), the mass of the fixed device should not exceed 5% of the bird body mass, while Kenward (1987) suggests that even devices constituting 3% might have a negative impact on birds' flight agility. According to Paredes et al (2005) and Harding et al (2009a), data loggers weighing approximately 3.0-3.3% of the bird body mass negatively affected the diving depth and duration, provisioning rates and frequency of foraging trips.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of bird-borne devices requires an evaluation of possible negative bird reactions and consequent disturbance of marked bird behaviour (Wilson et al, 1986;Wanless et al, 1988;Calvo and Furness, 1992). Severe experimental manipulations may alter the normal sequence of events related to nest attendance and foraging behaviour.…”
Section: Response Of the Birds To Experimental Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing number of publications show that tracking may come with a cost for the animal, which becomes especially problematic when it affects the measured behaviour (reviewed in [4,13,55,84]). Among the negative effects identified in these reviews are increased mortality, disturbed (migratory) behaviour and reduced reproductive success, eventually resulting in lower fitness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%