2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01551.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the United States experience with combined heart-liver transplantation

Abstract: Since first described by Starzl, combined heart and liver transplantation (CHLT) has been a relatively rare event, although utilization has increased in the past decade. This study was undertaken to review the United States experience with this procedure; UNOS data on CHLT was reviewed. CHLT was compared with liver transplantation alone and heart transplantation alone in terms of acute rejection within 12 months, graft survival, and patient survival. Survival was calculated according to Kaplan–Meier and Cox pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
88
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Survival at 1 year with our heart-liver transplant group is comparable, if not better, at 87% 1-year survival and 83% 5-year survival. Similarly, a large retrospective review of the US experience with combined heart and liver transplant, in a population that was mostly patients with amyloidosis as the primary pathology, demonstrated 83% 1-year and 71% 10-year survival [6]. The Mayo Clinic noted 100% 1-year and 60% 10-year survival in their experience with heart and liver transplant [14].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Survival at 1 year with our heart-liver transplant group is comparable, if not better, at 87% 1-year survival and 83% 5-year survival. Similarly, a large retrospective review of the US experience with combined heart and liver transplant, in a population that was mostly patients with amyloidosis as the primary pathology, demonstrated 83% 1-year and 71% 10-year survival [6]. The Mayo Clinic noted 100% 1-year and 60% 10-year survival in their experience with heart and liver transplant [14].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Various techniques for dual heart and liver transplant have been published, including staged heart and then liver transplant during a separate operation, heart then liver transplant during the same operation after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, and heart and liver transplant done in sequence on cardiopulmonary bypass. The worldwide experience with heart-liver dual organ transplant remains rather limited, with only a handful of reports concerning the outcomes of this therapeutic strategy [5][6][7]. There are mostly case reports or series describing an individual center's experience with heart-liver transplant [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The findings of severe fibrosis or frank cirrhosis on liver biopsy may be used to exclude the candidate from undergoing heart transplantation with a rationale that the risk of operative mortality may be too high to justify the transplant. 16,17 A small number of these patients may undergo combined heart-liver transplant 18 but the remainder will likely succumb to progressive heart failure. Biopsies are often performed with a request to 'rule out cirrhosis', but chronic passive congestion does not appear to progress to cirrhosis in the same manner as chronic viral hepatitis or alcoholic hepatitis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(50,67), but if there is a strong suspicion of advanced liver disease, cirrhosis must be ruled out before the cardiac transplantation or combined liver-heart transplantation is performed in suitable cases (68). In HFpEF, no treatment has shown reduction in morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Rivaroxabanmentioning
confidence: 99%