2012 IEEE 13th International Conference on Information Reuse &Amp; Integration (IRI) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iri.2012.6303031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the stability of feature selection techniques for bioinformatics data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People only need to determine the number of model candidate selected in each layer, which is very easy task for nearly all the problems. Third, one advantage of ensemble feature selection [1] is stability. Previous research has shown that feature selection is not stable on imbalanced datasets [42] and so we adopt ensemble of feature selection to make the results more stable.…”
Section: Transferred Feature Selection Based On Gmdh (Tfsg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People only need to determine the number of model candidate selected in each layer, which is very easy task for nearly all the problems. Third, one advantage of ensemble feature selection [1] is stability. Previous research has shown that feature selection is not stable on imbalanced datasets [42] and so we adopt ensemble of feature selection to make the results more stable.…”
Section: Transferred Feature Selection Based On Gmdh (Tfsg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible cause is that majority of FS algorithms are designed without consideration of stability aspects, and aim for selecting a minimal subset of the features with the highest classification accuracy [21], [44]. Another cause is existence of the multiple sets of true markers, i.e.…”
Section: Feature Selection Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that some stability measures are not suitable for large datasets and variable subset size [11], [20].This and other aspect of feature selection are described in several theoretical surveys such as [21], [22], [23]. We used two established and robust stability measures kuncheva index and consistency index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unstable FS method is generally believed to having little value [21]. As a consequence, the confidence level in selecting optimal features would surely get reduced due to the instability of feature selection results [22].…”
Section: B Stability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%