Abstract:This article undertakes a brief review of research concerning the frequency and the quality of legal advice provided in police stations in England and
“…Representation was also contracted out to independent personnel who are not necessarily fully trained legally and this can include former police officers. It was also shown that the quality of legal representation at the police station varies widely from very effective to ineffective and worst still adverse representation (McConville and Hodgson, 1993;Pearse and Gudjonsson, 1996;Ede and Shepherd, 2000). More recently, Pattenden and Skinns (2010) noted that the system has changed in that the police no longer put the suspect through to a legal advisor.…”
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to illuminate to the academic and research audience the legal implications for suspects who are interviewed under caution for historical allegations, when the suspect's responses rely on episodic memory recall. Design/methodology/approach -The paper is a review of a multi-disciplinary literature base, necessary to understand the problem with the qualified right to silence. Findings -The findings suggest that more research work is needed in order to be able to assess the difficulties for a suspect faced with answering questions of an episodic nature and the subsequent implications for the defendant once on trial. Implications: the current situation can lead to miscarriages of justice, which are difficult to rectify. Originality/value -This paper brings together a number of sub sections of disciplines from criminal law, criminology, forensic psychology, and mainstream psychology (i.e. memory work) to identify a potentially serious problem for preventing miscarriages of justice with the current system of qualified rights to silence whilst being interviewed under caution in the case of historical allegations.
“…Representation was also contracted out to independent personnel who are not necessarily fully trained legally and this can include former police officers. It was also shown that the quality of legal representation at the police station varies widely from very effective to ineffective and worst still adverse representation (McConville and Hodgson, 1993;Pearse and Gudjonsson, 1996;Ede and Shepherd, 2000). More recently, Pattenden and Skinns (2010) noted that the system has changed in that the police no longer put the suspect through to a legal advisor.…”
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to illuminate to the academic and research audience the legal implications for suspects who are interviewed under caution for historical allegations, when the suspect's responses rely on episodic memory recall. Design/methodology/approach -The paper is a review of a multi-disciplinary literature base, necessary to understand the problem with the qualified right to silence. Findings -The findings suggest that more research work is needed in order to be able to assess the difficulties for a suspect faced with answering questions of an episodic nature and the subsequent implications for the defendant once on trial. Implications: the current situation can lead to miscarriages of justice, which are difficult to rectify. Originality/value -This paper brings together a number of sub sections of disciplines from criminal law, criminology, forensic psychology, and mainstream psychology (i.e. memory work) to identify a potentially serious problem for preventing miscarriages of justice with the current system of qualified rights to silence whilst being interviewed under caution in the case of historical allegations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.