2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9101840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Role of Vegetal Ecosystems in CO2 Capture

Abstract: Abstract:The reduction of carbon emissions is a worldwide global challenge and represents the objective of many scientists that are trying to modify the role of carbon, turning a problem into an opportunity. The potential of CO 2 capture and storage by vegetal species is significant because of their capacity to absorb exceeding carbon emission. The purpose of the present paper is to draw a picture of the role of vegetal ecosystems on carbon fixation by identifying the most significant scientific contributions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been significant research into the role of perennial plants such as Miscanthus in enhancing carbon capture and storage (e.g., Agostini, Gregory, & Richter, 2015), although in the context of energy crops this has tended to concentrate on the restricted set of species listed in Box 1 and shown in Figure 4c. This research suggests that while currently used perennial energy crops may not impact soil organic carbon levels (Ferchaud, Vitte, & Mary, 2016; Ye & Hall, 2020), they do positively impact carbon draw‐down and storage within the plant, but choice of species is critical to achieve carbon capture outcomes (Di Vita, Pilato, Pecorino, Brun, & D’Amico, 2017). We propose that a diversity‐driven approach to plant and fungal energy sources could also involve research to identify novel perennial taxa that simultaneously maximize carbon capture and storage while a standing crop.…”
Section: Challenges and Risks Of Getting From Plant To Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been significant research into the role of perennial plants such as Miscanthus in enhancing carbon capture and storage (e.g., Agostini, Gregory, & Richter, 2015), although in the context of energy crops this has tended to concentrate on the restricted set of species listed in Box 1 and shown in Figure 4c. This research suggests that while currently used perennial energy crops may not impact soil organic carbon levels (Ferchaud, Vitte, & Mary, 2016; Ye & Hall, 2020), they do positively impact carbon draw‐down and storage within the plant, but choice of species is critical to achieve carbon capture outcomes (Di Vita, Pilato, Pecorino, Brun, & D’Amico, 2017). We propose that a diversity‐driven approach to plant and fungal energy sources could also involve research to identify novel perennial taxa that simultaneously maximize carbon capture and storage while a standing crop.…”
Section: Challenges and Risks Of Getting From Plant To Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this problem, efforts are being made throughout the world to curb pollutions by replacing fossil fuels with other sources of sustainable energy. Apart from this, there are efforts such as afforestation and reforestation for the consumption of CO 2 from the environment [ 2 ]. Other than this, there are attempts being made to enable adsorption of CO 2 into materials, which is also known as CO 2 capture and sequestration (CCS) technology, which can be employed further for the generation of electricity [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, the I farming system represented the scenario with the second least amount of impact in terms of energy consumption, although it had a higher "fossil energy" requirement than that of the other two farming systems. Based on sustainable development, non-renewable energy sources should be conserved and an attempt should be made to replace them with renewable energy sources [43]. The ratio of this energy category consumption to the total requirement was similar to that of the O farming system but was not similar to that of the other categories (i.e., a higher ratio for "non-renewable, nuclear" and lower ratio for "renewable, water").…”
Section: Energy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%