1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01623308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of osteoporosis

Abstract: Osteoporosis is a common metabolic disorder with considerable associated morbidity and mortality. The loss of bone mineral integrity and the resultant occurrence of atraumatic fractures are typically symptomatic of the disease. Currently skeletal status is commonly assessed using non-invasive conventional radiography and scintigraphy as well as densitometric techniques such as quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. But, apart from gross bone mineral density, the fine structure o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2A). However, there was no significant increase in E 11 and G 31 after 24 mo of treatment. This observation might suggest that the effect of testosterone treatment on mechanical properties is anisotropic, in that the estimated elastic modulus of tibial trabecular bone with higher initial loss (E 11 , G 31 ) in testosterone deficiency is less recoverable with treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2A). However, there was no significant increase in E 11 and G 31 after 24 mo of treatment. This observation might suggest that the effect of testosterone treatment on mechanical properties is anisotropic, in that the estimated elastic modulus of tibial trabecular bone with higher initial loss (E 11 , G 31 ) in testosterone deficiency is less recoverable with treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…CT and MRI are high-resolution imaging modalities that are now increasingly used for quantifying microstructural changes in trabecular bone architecture. (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) MRI of trabecular bone actually images the bone marrow compartment instead of bone, whereas CT measures Xray attenuations of bone mineral. One of the advantages of MRI is its noninvasive property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thcrefore, although MRT cannot measure BMD, it can provide images of thc structurc of OP bone, such as morphologic changes in trabecular microarchitecture and occult fractures in the proximal femur (98). Based on its ability to differentiate physiochemical processes, it can also distinguish acute from chronic, or benign from malignant, vertebral fractures (99,100) and assist in thc diiignosis of transient OP of the hip (101). Although MRI cannot be used to measure quantitative bone density, it is currently used to diagnose subtle ostcoporotic fractures.…”
Section: Other Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation of trabecular network with MRI is however, perhaps, less intuitive than with QCT and HR-pQCT because the physical principles underlying the generation of diagnostic images are complex and completely different from those of X-ray based techniques (126). In MRI, cortical bone appears dark (or as a signal void) due to the very small number of mobile protons and the extremely short T2 relaxation time; the trabecular bone network also appears as a signal void but the surrounding BM gives rise to a high signal, which intensity depends on the amount of fatty content (vs. hematopoietic BM) (102,127). Differences in diamagnetic susceptibility at the interfaces between BM and trabecular bone structure cause a reduction of marrow relaxation time T2*, and the extent of this decay depends on density and microarchitecture of the surrounding trabeculae (126) Today, high resolution MRI allows the depiction of trabecular bone density and structure in vitro and in vivo with a high spatial resolution (in-plane resolutions as high as 78 μm; slice thickness of approximately 300 μm) (8,102,128,129).…”
Section: Mri In Osteoporosismentioning
confidence: 99%