2015
DOI: 10.17430/895179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Performance of Wireless Synchronized Hearing Aids

Abstract: Some paired digital hearing aids use wireless technology to communicate with each other and generate improved binaural information. Coordination between the two ears makes it easier for the brain to identify sound sources and understand speech even in complex environments. How well does this technology work. This article gives an evidence-based review.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spencer et al [82] measured notably higher average JNDs of 68 ls in low-frequency ITDs with high interindividual variability in participants with symmetric hearing loss, which were not significantly different from those with normal hearing in their study. Phase distortions and corresponding ITD errors are likely to be expected when such thresholds are measured via bilateral HAs that are not synchronised (for reviews, see [83,84]). Poorest performance with JNDs of 150 ls and 100-350 ls has observed in bilateral cochlear-implant users [85] and bimodally-fitted listeners [86], respectively.…”
Section: Just-noticeable Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spencer et al [82] measured notably higher average JNDs of 68 ls in low-frequency ITDs with high interindividual variability in participants with symmetric hearing loss, which were not significantly different from those with normal hearing in their study. Phase distortions and corresponding ITD errors are likely to be expected when such thresholds are measured via bilateral HAs that are not synchronised (for reviews, see [83,84]). Poorest performance with JNDs of 150 ls and 100-350 ls has observed in bilateral cochlear-implant users [85] and bimodally-fitted listeners [86], respectively.…”
Section: Just-noticeable Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%