1982
DOI: 10.1537/ase1911.90.supplement_77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Osteological Characteristics of the Jomon Population in Prehistoric Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

19
96
2
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
19
96
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…12 As some morphological characteristics of the Ainu are similar to those of the Neolithic Jomon people of Hokkaido, physical anthropologists have hypothesized that the Ainu are their direct descendants. 13,14 This scenario has also been supported by the distribution of Y chromosome haplogroups among modern populations, in which the major haplogroup in the Ainu was observed only in the Japanese archipelago. 15 On the basis of mtDNA data, multiple origins of the Ainu were suggested with a possible gene flow of haplogroup Y1 from the Nivkhi people in Sakhalin to the Ainu.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…12 As some morphological characteristics of the Ainu are similar to those of the Neolithic Jomon people of Hokkaido, physical anthropologists have hypothesized that the Ainu are their direct descendants. 13,14 This scenario has also been supported by the distribution of Y chromosome haplogroups among modern populations, in which the major haplogroup in the Ainu was observed only in the Japanese archipelago. 15 On the basis of mtDNA data, multiple origins of the Ainu were suggested with a possible gene flow of haplogroup Y1 from the Nivkhi people in Sakhalin to the Ainu.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast, rice-farming people who migrated from the Asian continent, probably via the Korean peninsula, to the Japanese archipelago at the beginning of the Yayoi period had similar features as the Neolithic Chinese. Crania of Jomon people displayed low facial height, square orbit, and small teeth, whereas crania of Yayoi migrants possessed wholly large and flat features with large facial height, round orbits, and large teeth (Suzuki, 1981;Brace and Nagai, 1982;Yamaguchi, 1982;Brown, 1999;Ishida, 1992;Doi, 2003;Hanihara and Ishida, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanihara, 1991). Several researchers have demonstrated that the recent Ainu are closer to the prehistoric Jomon than they are to the Okhotsk people (Yamaguchi, 1982(Yamaguchi, , 1992Ishida, 1988aIshida, , 1996Hanihara, 1998;Ishida and Kondo, 1999). The actual genetic contribution of the Okhotsk people to the formation of modern Japanese is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%