2014
DOI: 10.1139/er-2013-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the mechanical and leaching performance of stabilized/solidified contaminated soils

Abstract: Stabilization/solidification (S/S) technology, which basically involves chemical fixation and immobilization of contaminants (primarily metals) in the matrix of cementitious binders, is widely used for treatment of contaminated soils. This paper presents a critical review of the performance of commonly used blended binder systems in S/S technology. The binders considered are Portland cement and blends of cement–fly ash, cement–slag, lime–slag, and lime–fly ash. This work compares and evaluates the performance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, among the samples with total binder additions of 2.5%, cement-treated lead-contaminated soil (C2.5Pb1) had the highest value of UCS, 886.388 kPa, an increase of 124%; the UCS of lead-contaminated soil after 2.5% quicklime treatment (S2.5Pb1) reached 619.055 kPa, an improvement of 55.4%, while the UCS of lead-contaminated soil (F2.5Pb1) with 2.5% fly ash reached 499.331 kPa, an increase of only 25.3%. This indicates that the addition of cement, quicklime, and fly ash all improve the UCS of lead-contaminated soil, in agreement with Kogbara [47] and Du et al [26]. This occurs because, when cement is added to water, the main minerals in the cement, such as C 3 S (3CaO·SiO 2 ), C 2 S (2CaO·SiO 2 ), and C 3 A (3CaO·Al 2 O 3 ), undergo a hydration reaction (as shown in Table 6), generating calcium silicate hydrate gel (C-S-H) and calcium aluminate hydrate(C-A-H), which in turn fill and close the pores of specimens and encapsulate soil particles [29,47,50].…”
Section: Influence Of Freeze-thaw Cycles and Binder Dosage On Ucssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, among the samples with total binder additions of 2.5%, cement-treated lead-contaminated soil (C2.5Pb1) had the highest value of UCS, 886.388 kPa, an increase of 124%; the UCS of lead-contaminated soil after 2.5% quicklime treatment (S2.5Pb1) reached 619.055 kPa, an improvement of 55.4%, while the UCS of lead-contaminated soil (F2.5Pb1) with 2.5% fly ash reached 499.331 kPa, an increase of only 25.3%. This indicates that the addition of cement, quicklime, and fly ash all improve the UCS of lead-contaminated soil, in agreement with Kogbara [47] and Du et al [26]. This occurs because, when cement is added to water, the main minerals in the cement, such as C 3 S (3CaO·SiO 2 ), C 2 S (2CaO·SiO 2 ), and C 3 A (3CaO·Al 2 O 3 ), undergo a hydration reaction (as shown in Table 6), generating calcium silicate hydrate gel (C-S-H) and calcium aluminate hydrate(C-A-H), which in turn fill and close the pores of specimens and encapsulate soil particles [29,47,50].…”
Section: Influence Of Freeze-thaw Cycles and Binder Dosage On Ucssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For the sake of achieving optimal moisture content (OMC), as shown in Table 1, a certain amount of deionized water was added into the soil specimens. Under this OMC, UCS, and other mechanical properties of the soils were at their best conditions [47].…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Stabilization results from the hydration reactions in the product and durability of the stabilized material is a key variable (Kogbara, 2014). UCS tests were performed on the prepared samples according to the ASTM D1633-07 standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kogbara [20] reviewed that the OPC dosage for contaminated soil may range from 4 to 20% by weight of dry mass. On basis of that the mixing proportion of cement and cement-bottom ash mix with dredged soil is taken as 4-20% by weight of the dry soil.…”
Section: Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%