A Review of the Literature in Applied and Specialised Kinesiology

Abstract

Introduction: Kinesiology is a diagnostic, therapeutic complementary therapy utilising subtle change in manual muscle testing results to evaluate the body’s energetic balance and select healing modalities. Anecdotal evidence suggests kinesiology is helpful, therefore we wished to critically review the literature. Aims: (1) To ascertain if diagnostic accuracy including inter-examiner reliability has been established. (2) To review whether there is evidence for its therapeutic effectiveness. (3) To critically assess the quality of relevant studies. Methods: Electronic databases were searched. Diagnostic accuracy studies were analysed and scored for methodological quality and quality of reporting using the quality assessment tool for studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (QUADAS) and the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Studies (STARD). Clinical studies were analysed for methodological quality using the JADAD scale and for quality of reporting using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). Results: 22 original relevant studies were identified. Their methodology was poor. Items reported on QUADAS scored 1-11 out of a possible 14, STARD scores were between 6-13 out of 25, JADAD scores were all 0 out of 5 and CONSORT 4-6 out of 22. Consequently, we were unable to answer any of our research questions. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence for diagnostic accuracy within kinesiology, the validity of muscle response and the effectiveness of kinesiology for any condition. The standards of reporting were low. We recommend a pragmatic study of the effectiveness of kinesiology as the most appropriate initial step to determine whether kinesiology has any clinical value.

Reliability of Sonomyography for Pectoralis Major Thickness Measurement

“…In a review by Hall et al, 47 applied kinesiology, one of the techniques used by chiropractors, is a diagnostic, therapeutic complementary therapy using subtle change in manual muscle testing results to evaluate conditions and select healing modalities. Among the 22 original relevant studies, they concluded that there was insufficient evidence for diagnostic accuracy within kinesiology.…”

Professional Kinesiology Practice for Chronic Low Back Pain: Single-Blind, Randomised Controlled Pilot Study

“…Anecdotal evidence suggests that PKP is a clinically helpful therapy; however our recent systematic literature review concluded that the quality of the literature in this field was very poor and with insufficient evidence to ascertain if kinesiology of any type had a specific therapeutic effect for any condition [10]. Our aim was to conduct a pragmatic feasibility trial to determine if there was any evidence for the clinical effectiveness and efficacy of PKP in chronic low back pain initially as a whole complex system as suggested by the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidelines [11] rather than make an initial attempt to dissect its component efficacy.…”

An Exploratory Pilot Study to Design and Assess the Credibility of a Sham Kinesiology Treatment

“…These systems became known collectively as 'specialised' or 'energy' kine siology. In our review of the kinesiology literature [2] we concluded that there was insufficient evidence for us to ascertain if kinesiology had any specific therapeutic effect for any condition. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that kinesiology is a clinically helpful therapy and we wanted to understand if this system was of any specific clinical value.…”