2024
DOI: 10.3390/app14062259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of the Impacts of Implant Stiffness on Fracture Healing

Yu Mori,
Masayuki Kamimura,
Kentaro Ito
et al.

Abstract: The bone healing process is influenced by various physiological factors. Fracture fixation traditionally relied on rigid metallic implants. However, excessively rigid constructs can lead to complications, necessitating revision surgery. This review focuses on approaches to improve bone healing by introducing adequate interfragmentary movement (IFM) at the fracture site. IFM promotes secondary fracture healing and callus formation. Studies suggest that rigid fixation may impair fracture healing by inhibiting ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the bone grafts experienced the opposite. It shows a loadsharing phenomenon between implant and bone graft, where the bone graft will gradually aid the implant in bearing the load as its stiffness has increased (Mori et al, 2024). In addition, 35% MBF or M3 had a better load-sharing condition than M4 even though the regeneration was faster during the early days, hence showing the importance of choosing a proper implant to maximize results and prevent stress shielding potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the bone grafts experienced the opposite. It shows a loadsharing phenomenon between implant and bone graft, where the bone graft will gradually aid the implant in bearing the load as its stiffness has increased (Mori et al, 2024). In addition, 35% MBF or M3 had a better load-sharing condition than M4 even though the regeneration was faster during the early days, hence showing the importance of choosing a proper implant to maximize results and prevent stress shielding potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%