Abstract:Researchers are increasingly exploring how neighborhood greenness, or vegetation, may affect health behaviors and outcomes. Greenness may influence health by promoting physical activity and social contact; decreasing stress; and mitigating air pollution, noise, and heat exposure. Greenness is generally measured using satellite-based vegetation indices or land-use databases linked to participants’ addresses. In this review, we found fairly strong evidence for a positive association between greenness and physica… Show more
“…Numerous studies in multiple countries have demonstrated that recreational walking, increased physical activity and reduced sedentary time were associated with access to, and use of green space in working age adults, children and senior citizens (Epstein et al 2006;Kaczynski and Henderson 2007;Kaczynski et al 2008;Sugiyama and Ward Thompson 2008;Cochrane et al 2009;Almanza et al 2012;Lachowycz et al 2012;Astell-Burt et al 2013;Schipperijn et al 2013;Lachowycz and Jones 2014;Sugiyama et al 2014;Gardsjord et al 2014;James et al 2015;Sallis et al 2016). Almanza et al (2012) used satellite images and GPS and accelerometer data from children in several communities in California, the United States to demonstrate that increased residential greenness was positively associated with moderate to vigorous physical activity.…”
Section: Enhanced Physical Activity and Improved Fitnessmentioning
Modern urban life style is associated with chronic stress, insufficient physical activity and exposure to anthropogenic environmental hazards. Urban green space, such as parks, playgrounds, and residential greenery, can promote mental and physical health and reduce morbidity and mortality in urban residents by providing psychological relaxation and stress alleviation, stimulating social cohesion, supporting physical activity, and reducing exposure to air pollutants, noise and excessive heat.This chapter summarizes the pathways that link green spaces to health and wellbeing, and discusses available evidence of specific beneficial effects such as improved mental health, reduced risks of cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes and death, and improved pregnancy outcomes Specific attention is given to benefits of urban green space for disadvantaged groups and their impacts on health equity. Potential health risks associated with urban green spaces are also discussed along with approaches to reducing or eliminating these risks through proper design and maintenance of green spaces.
“…Numerous studies in multiple countries have demonstrated that recreational walking, increased physical activity and reduced sedentary time were associated with access to, and use of green space in working age adults, children and senior citizens (Epstein et al 2006;Kaczynski and Henderson 2007;Kaczynski et al 2008;Sugiyama and Ward Thompson 2008;Cochrane et al 2009;Almanza et al 2012;Lachowycz et al 2012;Astell-Burt et al 2013;Schipperijn et al 2013;Lachowycz and Jones 2014;Sugiyama et al 2014;Gardsjord et al 2014;James et al 2015;Sallis et al 2016). Almanza et al (2012) used satellite images and GPS and accelerometer data from children in several communities in California, the United States to demonstrate that increased residential greenness was positively associated with moderate to vigorous physical activity.…”
Section: Enhanced Physical Activity and Improved Fitnessmentioning
Modern urban life style is associated with chronic stress, insufficient physical activity and exposure to anthropogenic environmental hazards. Urban green space, such as parks, playgrounds, and residential greenery, can promote mental and physical health and reduce morbidity and mortality in urban residents by providing psychological relaxation and stress alleviation, stimulating social cohesion, supporting physical activity, and reducing exposure to air pollutants, noise and excessive heat.This chapter summarizes the pathways that link green spaces to health and wellbeing, and discusses available evidence of specific beneficial effects such as improved mental health, reduced risks of cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes and death, and improved pregnancy outcomes Specific attention is given to benefits of urban green space for disadvantaged groups and their impacts on health equity. Potential health risks associated with urban green spaces are also discussed along with approaches to reducing or eliminating these risks through proper design and maintenance of green spaces.
“…Many of the analyses in this review examined health outcomes for which multiple other reviews find consistent ties between greenness and physical health -namely physical activity, birth and developmental outcomes, and cardiovascular outcomes [1,7,[14][15][16]. The analyses in this review represent a relatively small sample of articles using a single analytic tool to estimate residential greenness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical health outcomes were divided into 18 categories. These were adapted from categories identified in previous greenness and health literature reviews [1,7,8]. The manner of data collection for physical health outcomes was grouped into three categories, based on whether data were objective (i.e., biomarkers, vital signs), expert or clinician diagnoses (i.e., electronic medical records), or subjective (i.e., self-reported health questionnaires).…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We narrowed our criteria to two items: did the analysis include a subjective measure of physical health as its dependent variable; and did the analysis account for the critical confounding variable -income? We chose the latter criteria because a robust body of work demonstrates that this variable, more than any other, partially explains the relationship between greenness and health outcomes [1]. Not including a measure of income -such as socio-economic status or the common proxy, level of education -overestimates positive relationships between greenness and health.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Possible Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 of 26 Geographic information systems (GIS) software packages (i.e., ArcMap) provide powerful tools to provide empirical evidence on how different distances in which greenness is measured impact physical health. A multitude of remote sensing and GIS datasets (i.e., Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), land cover datasets, and park layers) can be uploaded into these packages to provide objective measures of green cover in countries around the world [1]. Buffer tools (the "Buffer(Analysis)" toolkit in ArcMap) can then calculate the percentage of greenspace -or relative "greenness" -within a specified geographic polygon, for example, the area surrounding a person's house.…”
Is the amount of "greenness" within a 250-meter, 500-meter, 1000-meter or a 2000-meter buffer surrounding a person's home a good predictor of their physical health? The evidence is inconclusive. We reviewed Web of Science articles that used geographic information systems buffer analyses to identify trends between physical health, greenness, and distance within which greenness is measured. Our inclusion criteria were: (1) use of buffers to estimate residential greenness; (2) statistical analyses that calculated significance of the greenness-physical health relationship; and (3) peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2007 and 2017. To capture multiple findings from a single article, we selected our unit of inquiry as the analysis, not the article. Our final sample included 260 analyses in 47 articles. All aspects of the review were in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Analyses were independently judged as more, less, or least likely to be biased based on the inclusion of objective health measures and income/education controls. We found evidence that larger buffer sizes, up to 2,000m, better predicted physical health than smaller ones. We recommend that future analyses use nested rather than overlapping buffers to evaluate to what extent greenness not immediately around a person's home (i.e., within 1,000-2,000m) predicts physical health.
Key Points
Question
Does the greening of vacant urban land reduce self-reported poor mental health in
community-dwelling adults?
Findings
In this cluster randomized trial of urban greening and mental health, 110 randomly
sampled vacant lot clusters were randomly assigned to 3 study groups. Among 342
participants included in the analysis, feeling depressed significantly decreased by
41.5% and self-reported poor mental health showed a reduction of 62.8% for those living
near greened vacant lots compared with control participants.
Meaning
The remediation of vacant and dilapidated physical environments, particularly in
resource-limited urban settings, can be an important tool for communities to address
mental health problems, alongside other patient-level treatments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.