“…the medicalisation of the birth process and associated valuing of physician and hospital-based care) • Ideas relate to both political and health system factors by influencing the values of citizens and either valuing or devaluing gender and the medical model | • Social construction of gender — the status of midwives in a given jurisdiction often reflected the value placed on women within the society (i.e. ‘gender penalty’) [ 8 , 11 , 41 , 43 , 46 , 48 , 61 , 71 ] • Some cultures did not allow women to receive care from men yet there were few health professionals that were women due to lack of educational opportunities [ 45 ] • Health system priorities as well as changing values were based on the medical model and normalisation of medical interventions, which favoured care by physicians and within hospital settings [ 41 , 48 – 50 , 75 , 78 , 99 – 101 ] • Incongruence between international recommendations for skilled birth attendants and needs of Mayan population in Guatemala for intercultural healthcare from traditional birth attendants [ 102 ] | • Nordic maternity care systems’ non-medical models and women dominated professional groups [ 37 ]; respect of gender equality and informed choice [ 86 ] • Increasing consumer demand for midwifery-led care [ 77 ] • Reclaiming Indigenous midwifery and bringing birth back to the community (Canada and Guatemala) [ 35 , 103 ] | [ 1 , 3 , 6 – 8 , 10 – 13 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 41 – 43 , 45 – 50 , 54 – 58 , 61 , ... | …”