1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0962-1849(97)80007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the feminist pedagogy literature: The neglected child of feminist psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Forrest and Rosenberg (1997), ''feminist pedagogy is the infusion of feminist values into the process and methods of teaching'' (p. 179). As such, feminist pedagogy encompasses feminist perspectives on ontology, theory, epistemology, and methodology (Campbell & Wasco, 2000;Cosgrove & McHugh, 2000).…”
Section: Feminist and Community Psychology Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Forrest and Rosenberg (1997), ''feminist pedagogy is the infusion of feminist values into the process and methods of teaching'' (p. 179). As such, feminist pedagogy encompasses feminist perspectives on ontology, theory, epistemology, and methodology (Campbell & Wasco, 2000;Cosgrove & McHugh, 2000).…”
Section: Feminist and Community Psychology Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commensurate with this view, community psychologists as practitioners of feminist pedagogy attend to the political dimension of identifying oppressive and hierarchal social relations and critiques of power (Duckett, 2000;Forrest & Rosenberg, 1997;Gridley & Turner, 2005). Furthermore, all strands of feminist pedagogy address knowledge construction and ''voice, authority and positionalityy'' (Tisdell, 1998, p. 140), while encouraging a reflexive approach in classroom interactions (Crabtree & Sapp, 2003;Tisdell).…”
Section: Feminist and Community Psychology Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The picture of stifled, rigid classrooms and frivolous, overly personalized course content drawn by WGS detractors is in sharp contrast to the descriptions of WGS teaching methods and goals written by WGS proponents. To be sure, most WGS theorists have stressed the importance of some teaching practices for which WGS has been questioned: guiding students to integrate personal knowledge and experience with course content, fostering students' expanding views of their life alternatives, helping students see connections between course content and current social and political issues, and encouraging students to take an active part in contributing to social change (Kessler-Harris, 1992;Maher & Tetreault, 1994;Forrest & Rosenberg, 1997;Hoffmann & Stake, 1998;Marchbank et al, 2003). However, WGS writers have also emphasized other, balancing pedagogy themes that suggest a quite different classroom atmosphere than that described by the WGS critics.…”
Section: Contrasting Views Of Wgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, a strong theme in the literature on WGS pedagogy is the development of open-mindedness and independent, critical thinking. The stated goal is to develop students' ability to examine and critique all sources of knowledge, including established authorities, and to expand students' understanding of alternate perspectives and value systems (Kessler-Harris, 1992;Forrest & Rosenberg, 1997;Hoffmann & Stake, 1998;Marchbank et al, 2003). Thus, WGS writers describe a balanced and intellectually challenging pedagogy that integrates the themes of personal growth and social awareness with an emphasis on open and full classroom dialog and strong critical thinking skills.…”
Section: Contrasting Views Of Wgsmentioning
confidence: 99%