2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the environmental corrosion, fate and bioavailability of munitions grade depleted uranium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
55
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper continental crust averages estimated by several authors range from 1.55 to 2.8 mg U kg − 1 (Gao et al, 1998;Hu and Gao, 2008;Taylor, 1964;Taylor and McLennan, 1995), whereas the U concentrations in uncontaminated soils worldwide vary between 1.9-4.4 mg kg − 1 (Kabata-Pendias, 2011) and the mean world concentration estimated by Reimann and Caritat (1998) is 2.7 mg kg − 1 . However, excessive amounts of uranium have been released into the environment through the activities associated with the nuclear industry (e.g., Bai et al, 2010;Benedict et al, 1981) and many other anthropogenic sources, such as mining and milling operations, disposal and discharge of industrial waste and effluent, disposal of medical waste, military applications, and the use of phosphate fertilizer in agricultural land (e.g., Campbell et al, 2015;Handley-Sidhu et al, 2010;Kratz and Schnug, 2006;Merkel, 2006;Schnug et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper continental crust averages estimated by several authors range from 1.55 to 2.8 mg U kg − 1 (Gao et al, 1998;Hu and Gao, 2008;Taylor, 1964;Taylor and McLennan, 1995), whereas the U concentrations in uncontaminated soils worldwide vary between 1.9-4.4 mg kg − 1 (Kabata-Pendias, 2011) and the mean world concentration estimated by Reimann and Caritat (1998) is 2.7 mg kg − 1 . However, excessive amounts of uranium have been released into the environment through the activities associated with the nuclear industry (e.g., Bai et al, 2010;Benedict et al, 1981) and many other anthropogenic sources, such as mining and milling operations, disposal and discharge of industrial waste and effluent, disposal of medical waste, military applications, and the use of phosphate fertilizer in agricultural land (e.g., Campbell et al, 2015;Handley-Sidhu et al, 2010;Kratz and Schnug, 2006;Merkel, 2006;Schnug et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, average uranium levels in drinking water are in microgram-per-liter range (0.4  μ g/L throughout the world, [3]; 6.7  μ g/L in USA, [4]; 4  μ g/L in Canada [5]; 2.2  μ g/L in China [6]; or 2.22  μ g/L in France [7], but they may reach exceptionally the milligram-per-liter range in some specific areas, including some US states (2.5 mg/L [4]; 7.8 mg/L [8]) or southern Finland (9.2 mg/L [9]; 3.4 mg/L [10]). Anthropogenic utilization of uranium for civil, military, and nuclear fuel purposes leads to additional release of this radio element into environment, either around uranium mining sites [11, 12], uranium reprocessing plants [13], or following the use of depleted uranium (DU) in conflict zones [11, 14]. The persistent use of depleted uranium in weapon composition in the recent conflicts (Iraq in 1991 and 2001, Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1995, and Kosovo in 1999) continues to keep the scientific and social queries concerning the environmental contamination by such metal, as well as subsequent human exposure and possible consequences on health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DU munitions, DU shrapnel, and the uranium oxides that form upon burning will dissolve in the environment [9, 24], in simulated gastrointestinal fluid [25], and in vivo [14, 15, 26]. Therefore, understanding the toxicology of soluble uranium may provide relevant insight into all long-term uranium exposures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%