2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2008.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the current understanding of seismic shear-wave splitting in the Earth’s crust and common fallacies in interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
128
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
3
128
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Time delays are sensitive to small changes in microcrack geometry, since changes in shear wave splitting monitor the small-scale stress-induced deformation of microcracks throughout the rock mass before a level of microcracking known as fracture criticality is reached when rocks are expected to fracture (Crampin and Chastin, 2003). Temporal variations in shear-wave time-delays have been observed before several earthquakes with magnitudes M 1.7 to M 7.7 (Crampin and Peacock, 2008). These observations have been performed in different regions, worldwide, such as Iceland (Crampin et al, 1999), China (Gao et al, 1998), U.S.A. (Liu et al, 1997) and Taiwan (Crampin and Gao, 2005).…”
Section: Temporal Variation Of Time Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time delays are sensitive to small changes in microcrack geometry, since changes in shear wave splitting monitor the small-scale stress-induced deformation of microcracks throughout the rock mass before a level of microcracking known as fracture criticality is reached when rocks are expected to fracture (Crampin and Chastin, 2003). Temporal variations in shear-wave time-delays have been observed before several earthquakes with magnitudes M 1.7 to M 7.7 (Crampin and Peacock, 2008). These observations have been performed in different regions, worldwide, such as Iceland (Crampin et al, 1999), China (Gao et al, 1998), U.S.A. (Liu et al, 1997) and Taiwan (Crampin and Gao, 2005).…”
Section: Temporal Variation Of Time Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S-wave splits into S V and S H with vertically polarized part of the wave (S V ) travelling faster within the layers, while S H travels slower across the fine thin sedimentary layers (Crampin and Peacock 2008). However, the observed fine-layering-induced S-wave polarization does not reflect azimuthal anisotropy as both the V p and V s (V s1 & V s2 ) are azimuthally invariant.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The splitting of S-wave into two orthogonal polarizations in a transversely anisotropic medium is a typical characteristic splitting described by Crampin and Peacock (2008) and it is caused by finelayering in stratified formations, where polarization is controlled by the faster direction of wave propagation. S-wave splits into S V and S H with vertically polarized part of the wave (S V ) travelling faster within the layers, while S H travels slower across the fine thin sedimentary layers (Crampin and Peacock 2008).…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SWS has been discussed extensively by S. Crampin and many others;; see Crampin and Peacock (2008) for a recent review of shallow SWS, and Savage (1999) for a recent review of deeper SWS.…”
Section: Weak Polar Anisotropy; Body Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%