2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the clinical implications of anti-infective biomaterials and infection-resistant surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
185
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
185
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The over use of antibiotics and increased antibiotic resistance from pathogens is considered one of the most concerning health threats of the 21st century, and new technologies addressing the issue are desperately needed [9][10][11][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The over use of antibiotics and increased antibiotic resistance from pathogens is considered one of the most concerning health threats of the 21st century, and new technologies addressing the issue are desperately needed [9][10][11][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection is caused by either bacterial colonization at the wound site or foreign body response resulting from the implant material [5].Antibacterial biomaterials are one of the greatest interests in the war against implant-related infections, representing the broadest group of anti-infective biomaterials [6]. Focal antibacterial drug-loaded biomaterials can deliver a desired drug dose directly to the infected site for an extended time period while minimizing systemic distribution of toxic drugs [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, one cannot fail to point out that there is still need for more studies involving surgery with implants, especially with regards to the safety of antibiofilm strategies to treat infections involving bone tissue and biomaterials (11) . This would also be a point to consider in studies on readmission following orthopedic surgery, considering that infections associated with the use of biomaterials differ in epidemiology, etiology and severity in relation to procedures which are not used (14) . It is noteworthy here that there was no mention in any of the studies about extrinsic factors for surgical site infections, namely: hospital stay prior to the procedure, processing of items and materials for care, surgical techniques, or operating room environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are numbers that could support political decisions related to training of specialized personnel, targeting resources and quality of care (13) . Post-operative infections in orthopedics are considered serious and devastating complications which generate economic, clinical and social impacts (14) , leading to subsequent hospitalizations and new surgical interventions. The whole multidisciplinary team should be involved in order to recognize conditions and risk factors already identified in the literature in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%