2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe applications of the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework were reviewed for several Social-Ecological Systems (SES), with an emphasis on the coastal environment. The evolution of DPSIR was traced from the Stress-Response framework to its present form. Discrepancies in the definitions of the DPSIR's information categories are presented. The application of the framework was explored both as a discrete tool and combined with other methods for different coastal and estuarine sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
173
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
173
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, we find it an appropriate guide through which to organize our analysis of an SES. The DPSIR framework has been used to study policy responses in SESs [22] and to develop adaptive management approaches [23]. It has been applied to identify responses to coastal vulnerability [24], the impacts of aquaculture [25], and the effects of pollution in marine environments ( [26], see also the review in [23]), but it has not yet been used to specifically consider change in mangrove SESs.…”
Section: Dpsir Framework and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we find it an appropriate guide through which to organize our analysis of an SES. The DPSIR framework has been used to study policy responses in SESs [22] and to develop adaptive management approaches [23]. It has been applied to identify responses to coastal vulnerability [24], the impacts of aquaculture [25], and the effects of pollution in marine environments ( [26], see also the review in [23]), but it has not yet been used to specifically consider change in mangrove SESs.…”
Section: Dpsir Framework and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review was carried out to identify existing definitions of DPSIR and how relevant they were to support the analysis of European policy responses to aquatic biodiversity loss (Elliott et al, 2017;PatrĂ­cio et al, 2016;AnzaldĂșa et al, 2016;Gari et al, 2015;Hering et al, 2015;Haines-Young and Potschin, 2013;Maes et al, 2013;CIS, 2011;Fisher et al, 2009). Based on existing definitions and because of a need for consistency across freshwater, coastal and marine realms, a set of definitions was developed for the purpose of the policy analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consolidated definition of the DPSIR framework for freshwater, coastal and marine aquatic realms. Based on the work of AnzaldĂșa et al (2016), Gari et al (2015), Haines-Young and Potschin (2013), Maes et al (2013), CIS (2011) and Fisher et al (2009) pressures. The six selected pressures are presented in Table 2 together with their link to biodiversity loss, related drivers and their significance and trend.…”
Section: Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the recent past, stakeholders frequently used the DPSIR (Drivers, Pressures, State change, Impact and Response) interlinking framework (e.g., Atkins et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2014), without clearly defining each element. Hence, the wide use of DPSIR model (Gari et al, 2015;Lewison et al, 2016;PatrĂ­cio et al, 2016a) not only introduced many variants and perpetuated confusion but also made it not-fit-forpurpose in providing management guidance.…”
Section: Progress Beyond the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%