2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8848-3_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Test Case Prioritization and Optimization Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of test prioritization [159,189,36,188,73,45,100,191,46,48,22,41] is to minimizing test time and maximizing efficiency with running fault revealing tests first. Thus, these techniques rely on data such as statement coverage for fault detection and hope that satisfying these coverage goals will lead to an increasing fault detection rate.…”
Section: Failure Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of test prioritization [159,189,36,188,73,45,100,191,46,48,22,41] is to minimizing test time and maximizing efficiency with running fault revealing tests first. Thus, these techniques rely on data such as statement coverage for fault detection and hope that satisfying these coverage goals will lead to an increasing fault detection rate.…”
Section: Failure Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its introduction in 1997, TCP has been one of the most effective methods for performing regression testing [9]. In TCP, test cases are rescheduled for execution in an appropriate order so as to increase test effectiveness in meeting some performance goals such as increasing the rate of faults detection [2], [10], [11]. In terms of performance, TCP outperforms other regression testing approaches, such as the test selection and hybrid approach, as TCP accelerates fault detection, mimics bug fixing time and avoids test omission drawbacks [10]- [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%