2017
DOI: 10.3133/sir20175087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of surface energy balance models for estimating actual evapotranspiration with remote sensing at high spatiotemporal resolution over large extents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the validation test against individual AmeriFlux towers shows about 10–30% uncertainty associated with the MOD16 ET products (Mu et al, 2011; Velpuri et al, 2013). Furthermore, all remote sensing‐based ET products will have certain assumptions leading to biases (McShane et al, 2017). Our model also has the advantage of learning how to use each input data set given its relationship to the training data, and thus can implicitly account for biases in each product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the validation test against individual AmeriFlux towers shows about 10–30% uncertainty associated with the MOD16 ET products (Mu et al, 2011; Velpuri et al, 2013). Furthermore, all remote sensing‐based ET products will have certain assumptions leading to biases (McShane et al, 2017). Our model also has the advantage of learning how to use each input data set given its relationship to the training data, and thus can implicitly account for biases in each product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [ 107 ]; for the cold pixel, the ratio and is assumed to be 1.05. However, this assumption is not always true at the beginning or outside of the growing season when the vegetation is much less than the alfalfa [ 18 ]. Therefore, the ratios of the and for the cold and hot pixels are calculated by NDVI [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing models have been useful in accounting for the spatial variability of ET at regional scales when using satellite platforms such as Landsat and ASTER [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Since the satellite started being applied [ 18 ], several remote sensing models have been developed to estimate ET, such as surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL) [ 8 , 15 ], mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC) [ 19 ], the dual temperature difference (DTD) [ 20 ], and the Priestley–Taylor TSEB (TSEB-PT) [ 21 ]. Remote sensing techniques can provide information such as normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), leaf area index (LAI), surface temperature, and surface albedo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study aimed at evaluating spatial ET maps from UAS based remote sensing (RS) data relative to satellite-based RS data for crops grown in commercial farming operations. As the conventional METRIC model is well-established for spatial ET mapping for its corroboration in over 25 countries and in almost all types of agroclimatic zones [22], the additional field validation was deemed not necessary, i.e., outside the scope of the study. Thus, we did not conduct ground-reference ET measurements.…”
Section: Output Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%