A Review of Suicide Risk Assessment Tools and Their Measured Psychometric Properties in Korea

Abstract

While there has been a slew of review studies on suicide measurement tools until now, there were not any reviews focusing on suicide assessment tools available in Korea. This review aimed to examine the psychometric properties of tools developed in Korea or the translated versions from the original tools in their foreign language and to identify potential improvements and supplements for these tools. A literature search was done using the Korean academic information search service, Research Information Service System, to identify the suicide measures to be included in this review. Abstracts were screened to identify which measures were used to assess suicide-related factors. Based on the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 tools remained and we assessed their psychometric properties. The current review indicated several major findings. First, many of the tools did not report predictive validity and even those with predictive validity were based on past suicide attempts. Second, some of the tools overlooked the interactive component for the cause of suicide. In addition, information to supplement the self-reported and clinician-administered reports by collecting reports from the subjects' families and acquaintances is needed. It is also important to develop a screening tool that examines other aspects of an individual's personal life, including unemployment, bereavement, divorce, and childhood trauma. Moreover, tools that have been studied in more diverse groups of the population are needed to increase external validity. Finally, the linguistic translation of the tools into Korean needs to consider other cultural, social, and psychological factors of the sample of interest.

Prediction of suicidality in bipolar disorder using variability of intrinsic brain activity and machine learning

“…In a meta‐analysis evaluating the suicide risk in psychiatric patients, it was predicted that approximately half of suicides happened in lower‐risk groups (Harmer et al, 2020 ; Matthew Large et al, 2016 ). Approaches concerning sociodemographic and clinical risk factors to screening for suicide risk have predictive uncertainty with high sensitivity but lower specificity or the opposite (Baek et al, 2021 ; Belsher et al, 2019 ; Large et al, 2018 ), which is problematic. The significant associations between the predicted score and the results of clinical assessment between both attempters and nonattempters (Figure 2a ) indicated that neuroimaging had potential clinical value for the early categorization of suicidal behavior.…”

Effective suicide prevention strategies in primary healthcare settings: a systematic review

“…There are many instruments to screen suicide risk or to predict suicide. In-Chul Baek et al have provided the list of different suicide and depression risk assessment tools in a review study [32]. Among the wide range of depression screening tools, the Beck's Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSSI) [33] and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) [34] were the most frequently carried out.…”

Analysis of the Past, Present and the Future of International Student Mobility: A Retrospective Review

“…Similarly, Roy et al (2019) review studies on the various outcomes students who participate in short-term ISM programmes face and group these outcomes into broad categories related to cultural, personal and career/employment outcomes. Furthermore, the other side of the review studies has focused on ISM approaches and experiences unique to specific regions or countries (e.g., Baek et al, 2021;Bouchaib, 2023;Browne et al, 2015;Knight-Grofe & Deacon, 2016;Russell et al, 2021). Interestingly, few bibliometric reviews on the domain were recently reported (e.g., Gümüş et al, 2020;López-Duarte et al, 2021;Pham et al, 2021).…”