2017
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2017.21439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of strategies for RO brine minimization in inland desalination plants

Abstract: a b s t r ac tWater scarcity in many inland areas is increasing the demand for new groundwater desalination plants. Co-produced coal seam gas (CSG) water (or coal bed methane as known in the USA), which is mostly brackish, is extracted in huge quantities during CSG production and requires advanced treatment. Reverse osmosis (RO) is the leading technology applied in municipal desalination and for treating CSG water in Australia and in some locations in the USA. Antiscalants are often dosed during RO pretreatmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interest in RO technology has led to recent and ongoing improvements in the membranes themselves; the membrane arrays and their resultant flow patterns; feed conditioning processes; and energy recovery devices. Improvements in RO systems often have multiple objectives, including better broad-spectrum rejection of dissolved constituents or targeted rejection of specified constituents (Xu et al, 2005); higher permeate recovery and reduced brine flow (Rioyo et al, 2017); reduced fouling and scaling (Goosen et al, 2005); and improved energy use (Gude, 2011). While these objectives are all desirable, they are sometimes at odds with each other: for example, an RO system achieving higher recovery will consume more energy and have slightly greater salt passage.…”
Section: Reverse Osmosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in RO technology has led to recent and ongoing improvements in the membranes themselves; the membrane arrays and their resultant flow patterns; feed conditioning processes; and energy recovery devices. Improvements in RO systems often have multiple objectives, including better broad-spectrum rejection of dissolved constituents or targeted rejection of specified constituents (Xu et al, 2005); higher permeate recovery and reduced brine flow (Rioyo et al, 2017); reduced fouling and scaling (Goosen et al, 2005); and improved energy use (Gude, 2011). While these objectives are all desirable, they are sometimes at odds with each other: for example, an RO system achieving higher recovery will consume more energy and have slightly greater salt passage.…”
Section: Reverse Osmosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard methods to manage brine are brine minimization, direct disposal, and reuse (Giwa et al, 2017; Ji et al, 2018; Loganathan et al, 2017; Panagopoulos, 2022c; Panagopoulos et al, 2019; Pramanik et al, 2017; Rioyo et al, 2017; Rodríguez‐DeLaNuez et al, 2012; Sorour et al, 2015). Although reverse osmosis and thermal systems have been updated these years, there is still a large amount of brine during the process (International Desalination Association, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternate approach to enhancing water recovery when desalinating CSG associated water is the application of high pH RO systems [16]. Mukhopadhyay [17] described a high-efficiency reverse osmosis (HERO) process which initially involved a weak acid cation (WAC) resin to remove alkaline earth ions and some alkali metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%