2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459x.2012.00370.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Statistical Methods for Determination of Relative Importance of Correlated Predictors and Identification of Drivers of Consumer Liking

Abstract: This article attempts to deliver the following message to the researchers and practitioners in the sensory field. (1) Theoretically, drivers of consumer liking is based on relative importance of explanatory variables in a linear model. The problem is complicated when the variables involve linear dependence, which is the common situation in sensory and consumer data. (2) The commonly used methodologies, e.g., conjoint analysis, preference mapping and Kano's model, have serious limitations for determination of r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 we calculate the relative importance of each regressor without (blue) and with (red) the UBDC index by decomposing R 2 (see Bi, 2012, for a comprehensive review of this technique), which depends on the order in which regressors are considered, unless the regressors are orthogonal, which is usually not the case for the 3 decades we consider here (see e.g. Chiodo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Improvement In Mlr Analysis Using the Ubdc Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 we calculate the relative importance of each regressor without (blue) and with (red) the UBDC index by decomposing R 2 (see Bi, 2012, for a comprehensive review of this technique), which depends on the order in which regressors are considered, unless the regressors are orthogonal, which is usually not the case for the 3 decades we consider here (see e.g. Chiodo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Improvement In Mlr Analysis Using the Ubdc Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that Kano's method does not measure attribute relative importance within a Kano category, it remains the best approach for classification in the Kano model as it maintains validity and high reliability for assessment of existing as well as nonexistent attributes and also has no technical limitations regarding the number of attributes for analysis compared with other approaches (Mikulić and Prebežac 2011;Bi 2012;Chen 2012).…”
Section: Practical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Comparison of traditional methods is shown in Table 1; although several papers [24,27] have reviewed traditional importance measures, it is seen that these papers cover various categories with different emphases. In this paper, the dynamic characteristics of the traditional methods are compared.…”
Section: Traditional Importance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many researchers focus on the importance measures of -out-of-system [25,26]. Moreover, the most comprehensive research of current work in importance analysis was conducted in [27,28]. This paper aims to seek an efficient method for evaluating component importance of complex system as a multistate system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%