2020
DOI: 10.15302/j-fase-2020327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of soil nematodes as biological indicators for the assessment of soil health

Abstract: Healthy soils are essential for sustainable agricultural development and soil health requires careful assessment with increasing societal concern over environmentally friendly agricultural development. Soil health is the capacity of soil to function within ecological boundaries to sustain productivity, maintain environmental quality, and promote plant and animal health. Physical, chemical and biological indicators are used to evaluate soil health; the biological indicators include microbes, protozoa and metazo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nematodes were extracted by the cotton-wood filter method and identified to the genus or family level as described by Landi et al [ 17 ]. Soil nematode communities and their relationships with soil properties were investigated based on the following population parameters: (i) abundance of nematode taxa at the family level, (ii) ratio of obligate plant parasites (Pp) to bacterivores (B) and fungivores (F) (Pp/(B+F)) [ 27 ], (iii) maturity index [ 28 ] and the food web indicators (BI, basal index; EI, enrichment index; SI, structure index; CI, channel index) according to Ferris et al [ 14 ], (iv) diversity-weighted abundance based on nematode biomass (θ) and arranging soil nematode population on a functional basis into detritivores (bacterial and fungal feeders), plant-parasitic nematodes, and predators (including omnivores) [ 29 , 30 ], and (v) prey-to-predator θ mass ratio to evaluate regulation function [ 17 , 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nematodes were extracted by the cotton-wood filter method and identified to the genus or family level as described by Landi et al [ 17 ]. Soil nematode communities and their relationships with soil properties were investigated based on the following population parameters: (i) abundance of nematode taxa at the family level, (ii) ratio of obligate plant parasites (Pp) to bacterivores (B) and fungivores (F) (Pp/(B+F)) [ 27 ], (iii) maturity index [ 28 ] and the food web indicators (BI, basal index; EI, enrichment index; SI, structure index; CI, channel index) according to Ferris et al [ 14 ], (iv) diversity-weighted abundance based on nematode biomass (θ) and arranging soil nematode population on a functional basis into detritivores (bacterial and fungal feeders), plant-parasitic nematodes, and predators (including omnivores) [ 29 , 30 ], and (v) prey-to-predator θ mass ratio to evaluate regulation function [ 17 , 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of plant species richness on the soil nematode community depended on experimental duration (Eisenhauer et al, 2012). Soil nematodes contribute to nutrient cycling and have important roles in the soil food web as consumers at various levels (Lu et al, 2020). Compared to weed species richness, NPK fertilizer may have more effects on abundance and community structure of soil nematodes, which are ascribed to the high nutrient content in the soil resulting from use of fertilizer.…”
Section: G R a P H I C A L Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of free-living nematodes (principally C. elegans) for evaluating soil toxicity is just the beginning especially for organic pollutants. The advantages of C. elegans are a short lifespan, simple and inexpensive cultivation (300-350 eggs per nematode), and a rapid response to environmental change [34]. C. elegans can be used to rapidly assess chemical toxicity, with soil pollutants inhibiting C. elegans growth and reproduction [35].…”
Section: Nematode Toxicity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%