2023
DOI: 10.3390/batteries9110524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Sodium-Metal Chloride Batteries: Materials and Cell Design

Salvatore Gianluca Leonardi,
Mario Samperi,
Leone Frusteri
et al.

Abstract: The widespread electrification of various sectors is triggering a strong demand for new energy storage systems with low environmental impact and using abundant raw materials. Batteries employing elemental sodium could offer significant advantages, as the use of a naturally abundant element such as sodium is strategic to satisfy the increasing demand. Currently, lithium-ion batteries represent the most popular energy storage technology, owing to their tunable performance for various applications. However, where… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 189 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar cost, life cycle, energy density, power density, and efficiency of lead-acid, nickel cadmium, and lithium-ion batteries are compared in [31], listing lithium-ion as the best performing at the expense of cost. 65-75 [20] 20-35 [33] 200-400 [29] 140-300 [29] 160-275 [29] 25-33 [29] 55-65 [29] Power Density (W/L) 10-400 [29] 80-600 [29] 250-1000 [34] 60-110 [20] 70-100 [33] 1500-10,000 [29] 140-300 [29] 150-270 [29] 1-2 [29] 1-25 [29] Cell Nominal Voltage (V) 2 [29] 1.3 [29] 1.2 [32] 1.67 [33] 1.18 [33] 4.3 [29] 2.08 [29] 2.85-3.1 [35] 1.4 [29] 1.8 [29] Round Operating Temperature −20-60 [33] −40-60 [33] −20-60 [33] −20-60 [33] −40-60 [33] −20-60 [33] 300-350 [36] −70-100 [37] 10-40 [38] 20-50 [39] Charge Life Cycle 1500 [29] 2500 [29] 800-1200 [32] 200-400 [20] 300 [43] 10,000 [29] 5000 [29]…”
Section: Bess Classifications and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar cost, life cycle, energy density, power density, and efficiency of lead-acid, nickel cadmium, and lithium-ion batteries are compared in [31], listing lithium-ion as the best performing at the expense of cost. 65-75 [20] 20-35 [33] 200-400 [29] 140-300 [29] 160-275 [29] 25-33 [29] 55-65 [29] Power Density (W/L) 10-400 [29] 80-600 [29] 250-1000 [34] 60-110 [20] 70-100 [33] 1500-10,000 [29] 140-300 [29] 150-270 [29] 1-2 [29] 1-25 [29] Cell Nominal Voltage (V) 2 [29] 1.3 [29] 1.2 [32] 1.67 [33] 1.18 [33] 4.3 [29] 2.08 [29] 2.85-3.1 [35] 1.4 [29] 1.8 [29] Round Operating Temperature −20-60 [33] −40-60 [33] −20-60 [33] −20-60 [33] −40-60 [33] −20-60 [33] 300-350 [36] −70-100 [37] 10-40 [38] 20-50 [39] Charge Life Cycle 1500 [29] 2500 [29] 800-1200 [32] 200-400 [20] 300 [43] 10,000 [29] 5000 [29]…”
Section: Bess Classifications and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%