1995
DOI: 10.1016/0149-2063(95)90050-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
331
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
8
331
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Item generation is the first step in construct validation for a new measure, and the primary concern is content validity (Hinkin, 1995). In psychology, researchers have preferred personality adjectives to developing human personality factors, claiming adjectives originate in the observations of people, and have eventually become encoded in our language as trait descriptive terms (Peabody and Goldberg, 1989, p. 552).…”
Section: Item Generation: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item generation is the first step in construct validation for a new measure, and the primary concern is content validity (Hinkin, 1995). In psychology, researchers have preferred personality adjectives to developing human personality factors, claiming adjectives originate in the observations of people, and have eventually become encoded in our language as trait descriptive terms (Peabody and Goldberg, 1989, p. 552).…”
Section: Item Generation: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fim de buscar evidências de validade para a versão brasileira da ELET, nós conduzimos dois estudos de corte transversal (Hinkin 1995(Hinkin , 1998. No estudo 1, foi testada a estrutura fatorial da Escala de Liderança Ética no Trabalho, a validade de construto (discriminante e preditiva) da ELET, relacionando suas dimensões à supervisão abusiva e à satisfação com o líder.…”
Section: Escala De Liderança éTica No Trabalhounclassified
“…DIT but also general scale development guidelines offered by Hinkin (1995), who emphasized the need to assess reliability and construct validity of questionnaires developed for use in organizational research. Like the DIT, the MMJT contains six scenarios, and for each scenario participants are asked to make a decision, rate 12 issues that represent the stages of moral judgment, and rank the four most important issues.…”
Section: The Mmjtmentioning
confidence: 99%