“…A humanistic reading of these statements reveals ample room for the role of the geographical imagination in their interpretation. For instance, given the cognitive-material nature of place, the geographical imagination can be easily conceived as one of the ‘inherent conditions’ of systemic adaptability mentioned by Holling (1973), as an essential element in the development of institutional trust and inclusion noted by Adger (2000), and as an essential tool for the political, historical, cultural, and psychological contextualization cited by several scholars (Ainuddin, 2012; Birch and Wachter, 2006; Cote and Nightingale, 2012; Folke, 2006; Furedi, 2007; Lowry, 2009; MacKinnon and Derickson, 2012; Morrice, 2013; Munt, 2012; Nerlich and Jaspal, 2012; Tobin et al, 2011; Wolf et al, 2010). Another opportunity emerges in a list of factors that DiGiano and Racelis (2012) consider to be essential to resilience, namely social memory, a kind of collective historical context and emotional state that facilitates the interpretation of the past, the perception of the present, and the imagination of the future.…”