2018
DOI: 10.5603/gp.a2018.0079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of randomized trials comparisons of epidural with parenteral forms of pain relief during labour and its impact on operative and cesarean delivery rate

Abstract: Epidural analgesia is a well-recognised method of labour pain relief. It is associated with the parturient's higher satisfaction when compared to parenteral opioids. EA does not directly increase the caesarean section delivery rate, yet it can lead to instrumental deliveries (vacuum-assisted, obstetrics forceps) and a need to pharmacologically support the uterine contractile function. Further studies are required to evaluate the effect of EA on the course of labour, and methods of minimising its adverse effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, opioids by parenteral administration are not as effective as EA and are not seen as an option when EA is available [157]. Although other drugs have been used, the EA remains the most efficient for releasing labour pain [4]. However, it should be highlighted that this method of analgesia is expensive and not available in many institutions [146].…”
Section: Managing Labour Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, opioids by parenteral administration are not as effective as EA and are not seen as an option when EA is available [157]. Although other drugs have been used, the EA remains the most efficient for releasing labour pain [4]. However, it should be highlighted that this method of analgesia is expensive and not available in many institutions [146].…”
Section: Managing Labour Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be highlighted that this method of analgesia is expensive and not available in many institutions [146]. In recent years, a growing interest has emerged in the combined spinal-epidural method (CSE) for labour analgesia, with the benefit of utilising lower doses of local anaesthetics and rapid analgesia [4,150,161,168]. Advancement in knowledge and developing a novel therapy for labour pain has been partially limited by the absence of an animal model for this kind of pain.…”
Section: Managing Labour Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of studies demonstrate that more than 23% of primiparas characterize this pain as unbearable, 65% as very strong or strong, and only 9% as bearable. On the other hand, only 17% of multiparas describe this pain as unbearable, 46% as very strong or strong, and 25% as acceptable [3,4]. The factors which have an impact on labor pain are physiological, psychological, and social.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-pharmacological pain management includes a broad spectrum of techniques, including water immersion (shower, bathtub) or transcutaneous electrostimulation. They aim to alleviate the physical perception of pain and prevent suffering by improving psychological and mental elements of care [4]. Pain management has a low priority in many countries with low and medium incomes [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%