2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.07.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of radiofrequency ablation: Large target tissue necrosis and mathematical modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The "heat-sink" effect of large blood vessels ! 3 mm in diameter, which is considered as another reason for the incomplete ablation, [45,51] is not taken into account. Future work should be directed to addressing this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "heat-sink" effect of large blood vessels ! 3 mm in diameter, which is considered as another reason for the incomplete ablation, [45,51] is not taken into account. Future work should be directed to addressing this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat based treatments subject diseased tissue to hyperthermia, inducing coagulative necrosis, protein denaturation, cytoskeletal breakdown, and severe connective tissue damage [15,[24][25][26][27][28]. Solid tumors in the liver and kidneys have been effectively treated using hyperthermia, yet numerous side effects have been reported [21,24,25,28,29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volumetric heat generated Qp (W/m 3 ) due to the ionic agitation [10] within the biological tissue caused by the high-frequency alternating current during the pulsed RFA procedure [11] is evaluated by…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lethal temperature during the application of RFA for treating target nerve in mitigating chronic pain is considered to be at or above 45-50 o C. Moreover, it is highly undesirable, if the temperature within the biological tissue goes beyond 100 o C during the RFA procedure, as it would result in tissue boiling, vaporization and charring. Indeed, it is known that the charring results in an abrupt rise in the electrical impedance of the tissue surrounding the active tip of the electrode, limiting any further conduction of the thermal energy and acting as a barrier, restricting the energy deposition and reducing the size of ablation volume [9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%