2008
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.200710103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of (Q)SAR Models for Skin and Eye Irritation and Corrosion

Abstract: This paper reviews the state-of-the-art of in silico methods for assessing dermal and ocular irritation and corrosion. It is based on an in-depth review performed by the European Chemicals Bureau of the European Commissions Joint Research Centre in support of the development of technical guidance for the implementation of the REACH legislation, and is one of a series of minireviews in this journal. The most widely used in silico approaches are classified into methods to assess (1) skin irritation, (2) skin cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the earliest (Q) SAR approaches to predict skin irritation is based on the TOP-KAT methodology, however other methods such as BfR-DSS, DEREK and MultiCASE are well described, and approximately 20 additional models have been reported in the literature (ECHA, 2014). An overview of the systems developed for skin irritation and corrosion is provided by Saliner et al (2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the earliest (Q) SAR approaches to predict skin irritation is based on the TOP-KAT methodology, however other methods such as BfR-DSS, DEREK and MultiCASE are well described, and approximately 20 additional models have been reported in the literature (ECHA, 2014). An overview of the systems developed for skin irritation and corrosion is provided by Saliner et al (2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] In the OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals for acute eye or skin irritation (or corrosion), structure-activity relationships (SARs) and in vitro methods are incorporated into a tiered system to reduce the use of animals for chemical assessments. [4] A chemical is screened with harmless methods such as SARs and in vitro methods first. When it is deemed safe, it is then introduced into an animal to confirm its non-toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the needs and direction of the global effort to curb animal use, this project hopes to produce in silico models for eye damage or irritation, skin irritation and corrosion prediction. In an extensive review by Saliner et al, [4] many models for eye and skin irritation (or corrosion) prediction have been presented in the past, which also include software such as DEREK, TOPKAT, and MultiCASE. The review concludes that many QSAR models require further development, validation and documentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature review suggests that active ingredients of plant origin may possess toxicological potential 13 . Dermal irritation is sign of reversible damage to the skin following the application of any test substance 14 . In current work the Acute Dermal Irritation study of polyherbal emulsion in rabbits was conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%