2012
DOI: 10.1179/1461410312z.0000000001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of published sources for age at death in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean standard deviations of 21 days and 42 days are given for the different development stages of the first and second molars respectively in varied cattle breeds and nutritional systems 78 . The variability of the third molar might be even greater 79 , but has not been clearly defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean standard deviations of 21 days and 42 days are given for the different development stages of the first and second molars respectively in varied cattle breeds and nutritional systems 78 . The variability of the third molar might be even greater 79 , but has not been clearly defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their health issues frequently manifest as impaired wound healing and infertility, the main reasons leading to their premature slaughter by the time they are five years old. In contrast, cattle over the course of the nineteenth century and up until the mid-1960s had lifespans generally reaching the mid-teens to late-teens and even above 20 years (Jones and Sadler 2012). Premature senescence after a short lifespan characterised by constant, maximum performance taking its toll on their bodies seems to be the fate of HPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the upper molars was determined following Gentry (1999). Wear stages were documented after Grant (1982) and Jones and Sadler (2012) for the mandibular dentition, and after Skinner and Kaisen (1947) for the maxillary dentition. Occlusal length (L) and greatest breadth (W), as well as a number of crown heights (mandibular teeth: H of protoconid, metaconid and entoconid above enamel-cement junction, H of valley above alveolus; maxillary teeth: H of mesostyle and paracone above enamel-cement junction) were measured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%