2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of published anticholinergic scales and measures and their applicability in database analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
87
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
87
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As with the ABS, individual medications may be summed within the Anticholinergic Risk Scale and ACB to provide an overall anticholinergic burden score. A recent review identified the ACB scale to be suited for analysis of administrative data 32 . After reviewing 6 anticholinergic burden scales, we used a combination of the following 2 standard scales: ACB and the newly created ACB score developed in Germany to calculate the individual anticholinergic burden from prescriptions 33 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the ABS, individual medications may be summed within the Anticholinergic Risk Scale and ACB to provide an overall anticholinergic burden score. A recent review identified the ACB scale to be suited for analysis of administrative data 32 . After reviewing 6 anticholinergic burden scales, we used a combination of the following 2 standard scales: ACB and the newly created ACB score developed in Germany to calculate the individual anticholinergic burden from prescriptions 33 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was not included here as it does not consider anticholinergic potency and would therefore likely have similar limitations as those of the cumulative dose measure [17]. Additional details on the characteristics of anticholinergic measures assessed can be found in this published review [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scales exist for quantifying anticholinergic exposure cross-sectionally; [4, 917] however, only two published measures [developed by Gray et al (cumulative dose) and Campbell et al (average daily dose)] allow for the extrapolation of anticholinergic burden scale scores over time [5, 6]. The applicability of anticholinergic scales and measures for use in the United States (US) observational studies was recently reviewed by Lozano-Ortega et al [18] That review concluded that both Gray’s cumulative dose measure, which considers patient-specific dosing [5], and Campbell’s average daily dose measure [6], which considers anticholinergic potency, could be implemented in administrative claims data. However, as both anticholinergic dose and theoretical potency have individually been identified as contributors to anticholinergic burden, a measure that considers both could potentially capture the impact of the interaction between patient-specific dosing and presumed anticholinergic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[21] It has been shown to have better consistency in dose-response with adverse clinical outcome compared to the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) and the Drug Burden Index -Anticholinergic component (DBI-ACh). [22] The ACB is correlates strongly with the Anticholinergic Drug Scale, and both scales have been found to be well-suited for quantification of exposure to medications with anticholinergic properties [23] The list of drugs including in the ACB scale according to severity of anticholinergic effect (1=possible, 2 and 3=definite) are included in Supplementary Table 1. A previous list was used relevant to the period of study, but an updated list was published in 2012 which is available on www.agingbraincare.org.…”
Section: Anticholinergic Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%