2020
DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of public water infrastructure financing in the United States

Abstract: The delivery of clean drinking water and the treatment of wastewater are critical public services, and in the United States, they are provided by a complex system of federal, state, and local governments. The process of water treatment and delivery requires significant investment in infrastructure both for initial capital requirements as well as the on‐going maintenance and operating costs. The quality of drinking water in the United States is, on average, relatively high, but according to the American Water W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The federal government transitioned funding from grants to low-interest or no-interest loans, with the federal contribution steadily diminishing but not ceasing (Copeland, 2019). As the federal government decreased funding, utilities became primarily responsible for financing water service infrastructure as well as operations (Greer, 2020;Tomer et al, 2019;US Water Alliance, 2017). By 2017, state and local governments were responsible for 96% of water utility financing (CBO 2018;Copeland, 2019;Greer, 2020) with local utilities generating revenue by charging rates for services and/or establishing taxes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The federal government transitioned funding from grants to low-interest or no-interest loans, with the federal contribution steadily diminishing but not ceasing (Copeland, 2019). As the federal government decreased funding, utilities became primarily responsible for financing water service infrastructure as well as operations (Greer, 2020;Tomer et al, 2019;US Water Alliance, 2017). By 2017, state and local governments were responsible for 96% of water utility financing (CBO 2018;Copeland, 2019;Greer, 2020) with local utilities generating revenue by charging rates for services and/or establishing taxes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the federal government decreased funding, utilities became primarily responsible for financing water service infrastructure as well as operations (Greer, 2020;Tomer et al, 2019;US Water Alliance, 2017). By 2017, state and local governments were responsible for 96% of water utility financing (CBO 2018;Copeland, 2019;Greer, 2020) with local utilities generating revenue by charging rates for services and/or establishing taxes. This means that over time, the financial health of local water utilities has become more dependent on the financial health of the local community (Spearing et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Borrowing ability is determined by credit worthiness, which in turn is affected by the number of customers and their wealth. The financial capacity of a water system has become especially dependent on community wealth as federal funding has declined for drinking water infrastructure (Greer, 2020). Differences in financial capacity are likely more acute in the water sector than other utility services; given the fractured and highly localized provision of drinking water.…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U.S. government enacted the Clean Water Act in 1972 and the Safe Drinking Water Act in 1974 to provide its citizens with safe and clean water [1]. Since then, attempts have been made to protect the water infrastructure and provide safe water for the healthy functioning of society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%